Inspired by Apple’s Airdrop

  • memly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    For people not satisfied with the reliability:

    Me too, at the beginning.
    But I have never had a problem when it is Android to Android.

    After tinkering for a long while I found out that:
    The connection is much more reliable after allowing mDNS in my firewall settings.

    I don’t know if this is related. If it is, I hope it was mentioned somewhere so users don’t get frustrated when the app doesn’t work.

    In my OS, mDNS is blocked by default for public networks. (and every network is a public network by default.)
    The firewall is preinstalled (firewalld); the silver lining is that I understand more about firewalld and appreciate its customizability.
    Before this, I was only able to use ufw.

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      But can you use it to send to a device where you can’t install stuff?

        • vort3@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you want to send something to a computer in school or a work PC or something without admin rights.

          snapdrop / sharedrop work in browser, without any installation, and that’s the point. As much as I hate web apps, sometimes they are your only option.

          I agree that localsend is great when you need to exchange files between your devices often, but when you quickly need to send a file to someone’s PC without admin rights, snapdrop and sharedrop are a faster way to achieve that.

    • peregus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I don’t remember wrong, KDE Connect needs to be installed on both the devices you need to transfer file/text to/from, with Snapdrop (and PairDrop) you just need to selfhost it (or use the official website) without the need to install anything and they *can *work even when sender and receiver are on different network

    • sorter_plainview@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is no limit implemented, but it constantly failed to get an 8gb file to be transferred between two VMs. LocalSend is more reliable in my case.

    • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      i think there is no limit (at least on the software side), because it’s local network only, so nothing is uploaded to a server but directly to the recipient. i could be wrong though.