To each their own, but I find this decision really misguided.

It’s her money, not mine, so whatever, but l do not expect her to turn a profit in, rather the opposite.

In my view, the cross section of “IfR” users and people willing to subscribe monthly is rather small (especially if the money mostly goes to reddit - assuming I could afford it, I, for instance, would rather fund an open system like Lemmy).

And if Apollo’s dev Christian Selig decided that it wasn’t worth it with an already established paying user base, who already has a strong culture of subscriptions and exaggerated pricings, and one of the highest volume of users, at what probably was the peak usage of the platform; I don’t see how a small app like IfR can survive.

That, or Christian made a pretty expensive mistake…

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s no way to be profitable with this pricing. Simply no way. Each time an user opens the app it will cost 2 cents in API requests. Continue scrolling, open threads and the costs rises. In average, accounting all the lurkers, inactive and free users, it might look like that it could be supported by a $2 subscription. But then, who is willing to subscribe to an app to read a free website? Only the most addicted users. The ones that will doom scroll for hours. The ones that will do 10000 api requests per day

    Also, the server backend must be rewritten from scratch. Right now the app is open source and it’s talking directly to the reddit servers using the API key. After the change, it could continue to do so, but because extracting the API key from the APK is trivial, some asshole could extract/crack it and give her a massive bill

    Every single request must be proxied by her own server, making a check for a valid subscription to each user and also some quota management. Possibly some caching to save money on the most popular posts. Otherwise it will be trivial for some asshole to make a revanced patch to bypass the subscription. But implement this takes months, she can’t have done this and tested carefully in just two weeks

    Please someone let her realize this before she gets a massive bill at the end of the month, i don’t have a reddit account for that

  • ltt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Subscription with less features (no nsfw). That’s a no from me. I will not be using reddit on mobile.

  • Rogue1633@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m generally willing to pay for a service (I donate to Open Source Projects I regularly use) because of course there are server costs, development costs, etc. But in this case and after all that Reddit has done to its user base it would be a very bad signal to give them money for it… I like Infinity for reddit and would love to have an Infinity for Lemmy

    • Pechente@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other point for me is that reddit has been getting shittier long before the API change. Forcing you to use their crappy app when you just clicked a link on mobile, all this weird avatar and award stuff. The weird chat that got bolted onto their message system, yet keeping the two seperate?

      There’s no way I will pay for that.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you know, there’s actually 3? PM, Chat and Legacy Chat… whatever the heck differentiates the last two is frankly beyond me, a 12+ yrs old Reddit user…

  • SwissJackalope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love infinity but paying for Reddit to enable them to continue doing this is something I hope nobody does.