Arguably, some degree of food supply uncertainty is most natural, and what our metabolism developed to accommodate. Security is great, morally, but I don’t think our caveman metabolism is adjusting that quickly. I don’t think that should curtail the efforts we make to secure food for all, but it’s worth consideration.
There we go, that’s more like it
The Home Depot doesn’t make sense, Shell/Exxon/BP would be more appropriate
All infrastructure really.
“Four individually wrapped varieties” implies each of your grandparents was a separate, distinct nationality
Your loss, I assume you’ve never had a proper medium rare
That used to be me, until I discovered that a proper medium rare retains all that flavor and moisture while drastically improving the texture
You must be a crewman on the Sargossa
How to Combine Documents in Microsoft Word
I always suspected
Free? Someone’s never had to install the stuff.
Now I feel bad for the dog stuck in traffic
Fitting, since this picture looks like it was taken from inside the Van from the Clown Core album
I have a friend named Rufus Xavier Sarsaparilla
Their faces are similar enough
It’s definitely harder after college, but not impossible. You’re just going to have to put in a bit of effort. The two best recommendations I can make are:
getting involved in some kind of hobby that’s either inherently social (board games, team sports, etc.) or puts you together in the same place with other hobbyists (I’ve done a lot of socializing at rock climbing gyms, despite it technically being a solo thing)
working a job that forces you to socialize in small doses (hospitality, customer service, etc). Being thrust into micro interactions dozens of times a day makes it a lot easier to approach people in casual settings.
How? They’d figure out swap before they even started.
Probably because the US is now the aggressor?
I’d be surprised if there were millions in any one facility.
Edit: not saying there aren’t 5 or 6 figures, but a million is a very large number.
China considers themselves socialist because they equivocate the people with the state.
Isn’t that kinda the line between socialism and communism? That communism has no state, but that a socialist state can act as a sort of intermediary.
Not that it’s the only socialist model, mind you; a market economy composed entirely of individual private worker co-ops is another model, for example. Then there’s the issue of implementation, whether the people actually democratically control the government.
But ideologically, while not communist, I don’t see how that structure can’t be considered socialist.
“just” is a bit reductive, but yeah that wouldn’t hurt