Honestly, I would be fine with Blink being default if Google would divest it from themselves and make it an independent open source project that they just contribute to instead of control. They have far too much power with that one bit of tech to shape the Internet as we know it, along with a large chunk of computing that happens offline thanks to the growing ubiquity of node.js/Electron
And they’re actively using that control to restrict what we can even do with our own machines right now
Pretty sure it’s from an AI… Count the fingers on the cop behind the one lunging
The cop in the background has 5 fingers on one hand without the thumb visible, and they look too straight to be real
Most of the rest could be perspective distortion or bad focus (or both) but not that
I dunno, but I think step 3 is “profit”
I legit think the cams should not be able to be turned off, footage reviewed by a third party watchdog at the end of each shift, and any instances where the cam was covered or positioned to potentially miss something explained.
Instances of cops being accused of doing something where they clearly turned off their cams, at the very least, should be treated as if the plaintiff is telling the truth by default since the cop took steps to hide potential evidence
Yes, the reason they aren’t is they want people to buy new phones, not fix and upgrade their current ones. This is not hard to figure out.
Maybe the sand is the opposite of a non-newtonian fluid, is solid at rest but becomes basically fluid with vibration
Though I imagine sand would naturally behave this way if it isn’t packed too densely
Thanks! I’ve not been having many problems, but if it’s causing a performance loss it would be good to take care of it, I’ll check that out
I’m not familiar with these vulkan packages, what should I look for?
That’s not true, the placebo effect is very real
Debian doesn’t have sudo by default, you have to install it manually
Not sure what they mean by “non Ubuntu variants” though since most other distros add it even when they aren’t Ubuntu based
“You’re absolutely right, we wouldn’t want to take too long to break the network or open god rights vulnerabilities”
I’ve not heard of OpenSnitch before, that looks really interesting and I’ll have to check it out!
Honestly, I feel the exact opposite when a for profit company does that, because inevitably they ask themselves the question “how can I squeeze every last dollar out of this possible?”, which is never, ever, good for the product.
Capitalist hyperfocus on short term quarter-over-quarter gains is toxic and destroys pretty much everything it touches, if not entirely then at least in quality. While I appreciate the amount of development those companies bring to the table, the moment they’re in control of the project they’ll try to find ways to profit from it at the expense of the community, and it almost always results in a poorer product.
Debian vs Mint for server, I’d agree with you, but for desktop, Mint is trying to do something Debian never really set their sights on: making it easy to use, particularly for people switching from Windows. Hell, they even have a version directly based on Debian instead of Ubuntu just in case something happens to make it so they can’t run downstream of Ubuntu with a reasonable amount of work.
I think a better model for FLOSS in general is community owned and operated foundations that get backing from companies that benefit from those projects, but which do not let those companies gain sole or majority control.
*Just to stress, everything here is just my opinions and I don’t pretend to have all the answers, just observations of the world and the impact for profit companies have had on it… For that, I pretty much never trust a for profit company to act in good faith for the benefit of anyone outside of themselves. They may do so for a time, but eventually most of them will become too focused on profit to behave as good citizens.
Not sure why you’d think it would go away next year since it’s been around for 18 years and adoption seems to be going up rather than down, and a lot of people have switched to recommending it for new converts rather than Ubuntu
I don’t think that many normies have heard of Mint, but I don’t think that many have heard of Ubuntu either.
Fragmentation is a concern but it’s an unavoidable side effect of an open community with many people and opinions
For server, there’s Debian. I really don’t see any reason to use something else, unless you need RedHat comparability, then you’ve got Alma and Rocky.
Or OpenSuSE, if you really like that.
Ubuntu for server, though? Yeah, that’s a no for me. For the reasons I listed above if nothing else, especially their shitty attitude when they were asked to remove that unnecessary package that calls home and does nothing for non subscribers from the minimal image.
But in any event, if you looked at the context, I was not talking about server use anyway.
It literally says on the website where you download it, if you have new hardware to use the Edge Edition (though it’s not there right now, likely because the current Mint version already has a new kernel)
Fantastic for servers
As far as the software app goes, I like how Mint handles it: it clearly marks what’s a system install and what’s a Flatpak, and if both are available it makes it easy to select which one you want. At no point does it try to hide or obfuscate it.
Webkit is the engine used by Safari (among a few others) and, though I think the project is controlled by Apple, it’s licensed LGPLv2.1 and BSD 2-Clause
According to the wiki, it’s also used in PlayStation, Kindle, Nintendo devices, and the Tizen mobile OS… Additionally, it’s apparently the rendering engine used by the default browsers provided by both the KDE and Gnome projects
Honestly, though, I want to see something that’s not part of the Mosaic or KHTML families be made and gain at least some foothold…I hate having the Internet basically controlled by one or two mega corporations.
I still wish Opera hadn’t abandoned Presto…