• Masimatutu@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For one, hunter-gatherer tribes before the rise of civilisation were most certainly built on kindness and cooperation

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Check out The Dawn of Everything, puts to rest a lot of the myths about prehistoric societies that we tell ourselves. Early societies were consciously experimenting with different social arrangements and they were far more peaceful and egalitarian than we usually give them credit for. Their ideas on property were vastly different than ours as well. There wasn’t really an “our hunting grounds” to speak of. If you’re interested I’ll leave this video by Andrewism about human history. It’s well sourced and pretty informative

          • Lesrid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Turns out to have warring tribes you need to be organized enough to carry out a war.

        • Masimatutu@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There was plenty for everyone since there were a lot fewer people, plus there were no real territories that people claimed over longer periods at all since we were nomads.

          • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only real solution is intentional population control. But I don’t have high hopes we ever get there though.

            Everyone could have way more resources than we’d ever want to even use. But instead, we seem focused on maxing out the world population leaving the least amount possible for each person.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Agrarian Revolution really was where humanity started going downhill.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The first written evidence of slavery in the ancient world comes from ancient Mesopotamia. However, slavery was in practice much longer than that. Slavery most likely began when the first cities needed labor to keep food production up to feed growing populations.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And your point is?

        Simply trotting that out as a truth tells us nothing about how you propose to build a modern system that respects how we’ve evolved as a species.

        • Masimatutu@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m just answering the question. They ask what system rewards kindness, I say a hunter-gatherer one does. I’m not implying that going back to the stone age is realistic by any means.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some veil of ignorance everyone is part of the ruling class for a week type stuff? Or maybe just anarcho syndicalism.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m a leftist but I’m not much of a fan of the Soviet Union. I’m Finnish and middle-aged so I know a bunch of people who had to escape from there and I’ve heard first-hand stories about the shit that went on, and I’ve visited Soviet Estonia who got the short end of the stick with Russian imperialism compared to us. At least we stayed independent although had to grant a lot of power over eg. our foreign policy to the Russians – ie. Soviets, but it’s not like it wasn’t essentially a Russian project since they pretty quickly forgot about korenization and went for Russification instead – to keep them from invading (again…)

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One of the biggest failures of alot of leftists spaces is failing to criticize the failures of the USSR. Yes they had alot of Ws but they also took their fair shares of Ls due to external and internal forces. That being said there arent many leftists that geninuinly want to recreate the USSR. We are merely trying to pierce through the veil of Capitalist propaganda to recontectuallize what they did right and incorporate it into the modern political discourse.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Jokes aside communism is just as bad because it does nothing to prevent power from congregating at the top. The only difference is the type of corruption.

        Talk to anyone who grew up in the eastern block about bread lines. Communism is a failure in comparison to capitalism.

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So why not have a system specifically designed to mitigate greed in lieu of one that incentivizes it?

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because with capitalism, the greed is out in the open. Everyone understands it. It is clear and legal to push against the greed of those who have more.

            In a system that incentivizes “virtues”, greed will hide behind those virtues. And when you then fight against that greed, you are accused of attacking those virtues instead.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve always been handed everything, so they lack any useful survival skills, and they would definitely perish in the desert.

      So I say it’s a great idea.

  • Damaskox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad that there is goodness in the world as well!

    It might be a bit hidden away, but I encourage y’all to look closer and feel its might! ❤
    And go ahead and create some more yourself!

  • rchive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalists would argue that between capitalism and socialism, capitalism is the one that better accounts for greed, as it generally has laws to con strain it but otherwise uses it to generate all the production that’s the hallmark of modern society, division of labor, economy of scale, technological advancement, etc. Socialism doesn’t really deal with greed, it just sort of wishes it away. That’s why so many societies that have started down the socialist path have become at best poor and at worst authoritarian murder factories like the Soviet Union, Maoist China, Chavist Venezuela, the Khmer Rouge’s Cambodia, etc.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally no economic system or political science yet has managed to prevent the internalised drive for familicide or authoritarian violence funnily enough, one can only hope that rationality prevails over bad thoughts, but not on the basis of civilization or self preservation, but through the collective conscience of humanity coming to understand how best to maximize the available entropy and energy within society to produce the most jobs, the most utility, the most potential sex, the most systems of funding and all other human desires.

      Consider thot the US is a very rich democracy yet has many school shootings, Saudi Arabia has had to deal with corrupt funding of terrorists, China uses AI to bait people into crime and arrests people on false charges and then plays catch and release while Israel funds Hamas, imports overseas Jews and then exports violent “settlers” into the Palestinian borders.

      Consider that even millionaire dictators who go on holiday will occasionally commit mass genocide. All of these bad things… Are not going to disappear because of capitalism, but we can at least say that they would become more foreseeable and preventable in a world where we have movies or stories that discuss our present these monstrosities to light

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given the choice between greed with poverty vs greed with wealth, I choose greed with wealth aka capitalism. Like I said, capitalism at least does some good with the greed. Socialism, etc. pretends it can make greed go away, but it obviously can’t.

        Sidenote, a vanishingly small portion of people in the US are killed or injured in school shootings. They’re obviously bad, but when comparing societies on the societal scale, they make basically no impact.

        • Avnar@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you looked at Soviet Russia? They went from Feudal Backwater to Man in space within 43 years. Then Socialism was illegally overthrown against the will of the Soviet People, and all metrics fell, (Child) Prosecution, life expectancy,… There is no choice between Wealth or poverty you are born into one or the other and you are just lucky you are born in the West. Socialism always created better Economic outcomes for most people at the same level of Development as Capitalist countrys.

          • rchive@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Everyone went from feudal backwater to something else in that era. The US was poorer than Argentina per capita. That’s not really saying that much. It’s also not saying that much because of course if you have a strong central authority you can divert resources from more valuable production toward national pride vanity projects like a space travel. What really matters is how productive your economy is, how much it can produce for its society, and on that front the US defeated the Soviet Union soundly.

            I have nothing against a space program, I just don’t see that as a very strong indicator of the success of a society.

            • Avnar@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The US wasnt feudal in 1918, they where never Feudal. And they had a lot more industrial development than russia. Servdom in Russia was abolished in 1861. The US was always better economicly (for white people) because they had this industrial headstart, they werent destroyed in WW2 and the US had colonies and fought very hard to keep them. Panama, Chile,… If you want to compare a Capitalist countys with socialist ones at least pic one with a similar development level. You will soon find out that Capitalism only works for the heads of countys that are exploiting less developed countys resources and labour. Some scraps fall from the table down to the general population but only as much to keep them from revolting.

              The space race on both sides created a lot of inovation that laid the ground work for among other things Computers and Satelites today.

              And there is a declassified CIA document from 1983 that says that the soviet diet was potentialy better than the USs. That chaned drastically after the return to “Freedom” in Russia.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Communism quite literally exists to mitigate greed, and there is nothing stopping Capitalist countries from becoming authoritarian Murder Factories like Modern Russia, The United States, Britain, France, Belgium, and countless other examples of colonial powers that have exploited and murdered native populations. Billionaires get arrested and taxed all the time in modern China. While they almost never suffer the same fate in Capitalist countries.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No European country or the US is anything like Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. Orders of magnitude different.

        Billionaires get arrested and taxed all the time in modern China.

        They don’t get arrested for the reasons you or I would arrest them, they get arrested for crossing the CCP. Billionaires do face punishment in the capitalist West.

  • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, the problem with communism is that it relies on everyone having aligned incentives on a nation-state level, which is a pleasant fiction and can only be achieved through authoritarian coercion.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When was the last chattel slave in the US released again? 1942.

      When did slavery end on a global scale again? Never.

      Damn. Sounds like we traded the evils of merchantilism for the same evils under capitalism, but with a fresh coat of paint.