I’m connected via a 4G modem. Got this setup about 3 years ago. In the beginning it was enough to look for the public IP (what’s my IP). The modem showed some sort of private ip in the ui. I’m running stuff at home (Homeassistant, Gitea,) and bought a domain and pointed it to my home IP via Cloudflare. After some time I’ve noticed my modem shows the public IP also internally. For about 2 years now it ran flawlessly, the IP changed from time to time, but not really more than once in several weeks. For about a week all stopped working and the modem shows IP 100.xxxx and outside 85.something I guess I’m behind NAT now. Normal port forwarding on the modem is useless now. Is it possible to open the ports via UPNP? I’ve tried via miniupnp from my Ubuntu server, but it just throws an error.

upnpc -a ifconfig enp1s0| grep "inet addr" | cut -d : -f 2 | cut -d " " -f 1 22 22 TCP

Can I use this to somehow open the ports via UPNP on my modem and bypass the blocking? I can’t even OpenVPN to my modem anymore.

EDIT: i also run AdguardHome, that I use as Private DNS on my Android phone

UPDATE: everything except Adguard Home used as Private DND on my Android works! I’ve used this: https://github.com/mochman/Bypass_CGNAT/wiki/Oracle-Cloud-(Automatic-Installer-Script) - free Oracle VPS + automated well described script. Even HTTPS works fine!

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CGNAT Carrier-Grade NAT
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    [Thread #274 for this sub, first seen 11th Nov 2023, 18:30] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Welcome to the world of Carrier Grade NAT. 100.64.0.0/10 is reserved for this.

    If you are lucky, you also have an IPv6 address. The catch is you need IPv6 on the client-side too.

    A VPS or similar running wireguard and a proxy might bridge the gap.

    It might also be possible to ask your provider for some port forwarding. Probably not, but check anyway.

    Good luck!

    • Kwa@derpzilla.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is exactly what happened to me, but was able to contact my ISP to drop IPv6 support and get back my ports forwarding to work on my line

      • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        N.B. to anyone reading this: ask your isp to “opt out of CG-NAT”. Talking about IPv6 may confuse the staffer you’re talking to, it’s partially related but not the fully picture.

  • clericc@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    i’ve been on CGNAT and just pointed my domain to my ipv6 address with no issues - every isp should hand out huge v6 subnets dedicated to you.

    Since my v6 prefix is not stable, i use ddclient from my homeserver to update my domains AAAA record

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unfortunately IPv6 adoption is not universal. There will be parts of the internet that won’t be able to reach you at a 6-only address.

    • baldissara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I tried that and couldn’t make it work. My server was unable to receive any http requests. Then I tried doing some tweaking in my ISP router configuration but with no success. So far cloudflare tunnel was the only solution I found

        • baldissara@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah I set it up to forward 80:80 and 443:443 but it didn’t seem to have any effect. Does port forward work on ipv6 the same way it does on ipv4?

          • clericc@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            in m limited sample size of one avm fritz.box, yes. What ivp6 address did you use to try and connect? a device typically has multiple - i.e. dont use fd00::, fe80::

            • baldissara@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’d need to check it out, it’s been a while. But I tried pretty much all addresses that are printed out with “ip address” command on linux

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re already using cloudflare, so check out cloudflare tunnels. You install their software on your server which makes an outbound connection, bypassing the need for open ports or a public IP. Note this only does http traffic.

    Another option is tail scale, which won’t make your site public but will let you access it remotely on devices you have their software/app on.

    • farcaller@fstab.sh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m actually not sure you can easily get tailscale up and running om such as a setup as it uses the same cgnat ip range.

      • c10l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Been using Tailscale behind CG-NAT for years. It works wonderfully and very rarely needs to route through the DERP infrastructure - it’s almost always a P2P connection.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        This page says (at the very bottom):

        Tailscale can route its packets peer-to-peer over IPv4 or IPv6, with and without NAT, multi-layer NAT, or CGNAT in the path.

        • farcaller@fstab.sh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, you’re absolutely correct. I misread that thinking OP would have the CG NAT endpoint and taikscsle on the same physical device, which, I still think, would be a problem: you’d have two interfaces for 100.64.0.0/10. But if CG NAT terminates on the modem and you run taikscale on devices connected to it them there’s surely no issue at all.

          • c10l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I run it on my router which has the CG-NAT IP address.

            Whilst you’re right that it could clash, it’s very unlikely (a 1 in 4194302 chance), I imagine Tailscale would detect the clash and change IPs though I could be wrong as it never happened to me (and probably never will - though in all fairness it will eventually happen to someone).

            • farcaller@fstab.sh
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I went looking into how that works, and, apparently, tailscale adds individual node routes (in table 52). So yeah, you have very low chances of getting into trouble even if you have an interface with 100.64/10.

  • rufus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have you reached out to your ISP to see if they can give you a dynamic public IP? I recently swapped to a new ISP that was using CGNAT but after contacting their support team with my use case, they were happy to set me up with a public IP so I could continue my self-hosting.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I use a VPN that I setup on an Oracle free tier VPS when I need to access my stuff over IPv4. I also have IPv6, so I can connect directly when using 5G on my phone.

  • vettnerk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Unless they’re willing to give you your own IP (dynamic, or maybe static for a fee), that’s a good reason for replacing your ISP imo.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You say that as if most don’t hold a monopoly in their available regions. At least in America, you typically have the choice of one, maybe more if you’re in a largeish city, and I suppose you have the option of a 5G hub but that’s terrible for running services.