• CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The biggest mistake users will make is thinking their data is safe JUST because they have a NAS or a RAID. It’s common parlance in Systems Administration that RAID is NOT backup.

      To wit— not truly understanding RAID and how it relates to capacity, parity, and especially the time required to rebuild in failed disk situation. It is a crucial mistake to use RAID 5 with greater than 2TB disks, and even that is pushing it, but RAID 5 is at least in the zeitgeist.

      There are also some outside concerns such as Drive batch dates and knowing to pre-purchase spare disks well in advance that may hamper recovery.

      • Scrath@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I am currently using 2 16TB drives in Raid 1 and was planning to move to Raid 5 (or maybe it was 6) if I need more storage by adding a 3rd drive.

        What would you recommend instead?

  • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I wouldn’t say “built” if I bought an off the shelf one. Synology is pretty great though, don’t get me wrong.

  • bestusername@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I jumped on the NAS bandwagon about 10yrs ago and it really didn’t take that long before I’d reached the limits of the CPU and RAM.

    Last year I built an i5 system to replace it and it’s just better. Hardware and softwareb updates are just easier with a desktop. I can run my web server, torrent VM, DB, Plex and file sharing with resources to spare.

    If you simply want a device to store/share files, get a NAS, but the second you want to do anything more, build a basic desktop.

    Oh and it’s cheaper!

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just use an HP Microserver gen 8 with upgraded cpu and ram. But yea, just a relatively cheap computer is all 98% of the people really need, as long as you can configure enough disks. NAS’es are way overpriced with shitty hardware.

      • Scrath@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Depends I guess. For me the biggest concern when I bought my Synology was simplicity of usage and idle power consumption which is much lower than I could get with one of the older computers I have lying around.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, Lemmy isn’t exactly drowning in content, and looking at his history it’s usually upvoted. Block him if you like, but I appreciate the content.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    Plex Brand of media server package
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

    5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.

    [Thread #275 for this sub, first seen 12th Nov 2023, 02:20] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]