Due to my line of work, I find myself having to use both these services frequently, despite avoiding google as much as I can. I see a lot of alternatives out there for internet searching, but when it comes to specific fields, alternatives tend to be scarce.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.brOP
      3·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for the recommendation. I didn’t know archive.org had this feature, and it seems to be focused on open databases, something that even scholar doesn’t do. It will help me a lot.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      1·
      11 months ago

      It is fairly good for what it is, lots of things missing but I will certainly take it. Use it often. Recommend.

  • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.mlEnglish
    61·
    1 year ago

    I use JabRef for both finding research papers and generating bibliographies. It’s phenomenal and fully open source. Definitely worth checking out, I’m not even sure what I’d do without it these days!

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.brOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      I tried it, but didn’t find a way to search for articles. it seems closer to zotero than scholar. Am I missing something?

      • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.mlEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        In the top left there should be a search option. In settings preferences, be sure it’s set up to search all sources. I get tons of articles when putting in pretty specific topics.

        Edit: It’s in the preferences under the file tab. Here’s screenshots of my home screen, plus the preferences I use for it to search papers.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.brOP
      2·
      1 year ago

      Patents seems to be the hardest one to find alternatives. The thing with google patents is that it searches from multiple databases, from multiple countries, so we don’t need to look for each source.

      • collapse_already@lemmy.mlEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        I used to litigate patents, and for international searches I have not found an adequate substitute. Depending on why you are searching, searching may be inadvisable anyway, at least in the U.S. if your search uncovers a specific patent (or even arguably should have uncovered a specific patent) and you are later sued by the rights holder for infringement, your actual knowledge of the patent can be used against you to show willful infringement, a damage multiplier. Apparently, companies that know about a patent need to hire competent legal counsel to analyze the patent with respect to their products and give them an opinion on possible infringement. That process can be quite expensive, so it is often better to not search in the first place. I wrote a few opinions over the years, but it was not a common activity. Accusations of willful infringement were pretty common in litigation though, probably about 40% of my cases.

        Just writing this quick summary makes me glad I retired from practicing law.

        Also, you are not my client, this is not legal advice, I might be a fraud, yadda yadda yadda.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.brOP
          2·
          11 months ago

          Thank you for the tip. In my case, I’m working with technology prospecting, and we use patents as a source of information on what kinds of new technologies to expect, what technologies are about to become public domain, etc. It’s not something that can violate any IP.

  • jxrdsn@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    PubMed instead of Google Scholar, would have to use specific search operatives to find what you need though. Also Elicit.org is a site that uses AI to find articles and break them down a little. I think with a free account you can get like x amount of searches, so may or may not be feasible for you. There’s also Scopus and Web of Science, but I have no experience using those.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.brOP
      1·
      1 year ago

      I used to have access to scopus and web of science from my university, but I don’t have anymore, so I ended up using scholar, but looking for alternatives.

      Elicit looks interesting, but I see that it requires a login, and has a bit weird privacy policy. I will check it in more detail, thanks.