• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.

    knowledge is defined as a justified true belief.
    you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.
    truth claims about the future have no value because it hasn't happened.
    there is no justification that can produce knowledge about the future.
    
    you don't know the future.
    

    qed

    edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        are you suggesting that Marxist revolutionary theory is a science like meteorology? it’s not.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              They can’t perfectly predict the future in the same way that meteorologists can’t, but both beat a coin flip by a mile.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                “predict” is moving the goalposts. i said they can’t know, and they asked if i wanted to bet. i know that they can’t know the future.

                • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Exactly like how I can confidently predict your perfect spontaneous anarchist revolution won’t happen to tomorrow, no matter how much you insist that “it could”