• possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s just trading one privacy weakness for another, without being able to prove that original weakness has actually even been mitigated.

    It make financial sense to provide this option, but “pay for privacy” is a questionable way to describe the transaction.