Hong Kong officials have singled out at least two schools for singing the Chinese national anthem “too softly”.

Teachers at a third school have been asked to help students “cultivate habit and confidence” in singing it.

Hong Kong has redoubled the emphasis on “patriotic” education since 2020 when China cracked down on the city’s pro-democracy movement.

Officials said students’ voices at the Hong Kong and Macau Lutheran Church Primary School were “soft and weak” and “should be strengthened”. At Yan Chai Hospital Lim Por Yen Secondary School, teachers were told to “help students develop the habit of singing the national anthem loudly in unison”.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shit like this is why the kneeling protests in the states never bothered me. I’m proud to live in a country with freedom of expression. This kind of forced nationalism is a cancer

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Pledge of Allegiance has entered the chat.

      I’m aware it isn’t mandatory, but no one made that clear to me when I was a kid.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            I believe so too. I’ve instructed my children to not recite the pledge (because atheism), and will absolutely make this my hill to die on. It’s bad enough we’ve got money with that bullshit on it.

            It’s a stupid brainwashed idiot country and this shit drives me nuts.

      • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I live in New York, one of the most northern and blue states around, and have my entire life. In 7th grade I decided I didn’t like saying the Pledge of Allegiance, the name alone sounded odd to me, like why are children pledging themselves to a country, when we can’t even really understand what that means? So I stopped.

        The school staff lost their minds.

        Luckily my parents taught me to be firm in my beliefs, if I had truely thought about them and believed them. So I stuck to my choice, and my parents backed me up on it when they arrived at the school 45 minutes after the Pledge normally ended.

        On a side note, I had read ahead in my Social Studies textbook that week, and learned about Nationalism in Nazi Germany, and it had sounded strangly familiar to me. Not long after the Pledge of Allegiance incident happened.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They just “encourage” you to do it and if you get bullied for remaining seated, the school will ignore the bullies even more than usual.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You could have asked… I mean, you were in a building staffed with people paid to answer questions and inform you about the world.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          5 months ago

          Most of the staff likely would have told me that it is mandatory. There are news stories all the time about kids being bullied, given detention, and other negative repercussions, for exercising their right to not say the pledge.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            The small school I taught at said the pledge every day, but the principal did regularly announce to everyone present that they don’t have to say it (but they did have to be there for it)

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          High, high chance they wouldn’t have been encouraging. Reasons include their personal political beliefs and the fact they tend to care more about parent reactions than students, because guess which group they’re on equal footing with?

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I swear to Charles Darwin himself, they will get so much more reaction out of me if they try to force my kids recite that bullshit. (They currently stand there silently)

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Sure, but I assume in some places parents (plural) will raise a stink about a kid that’s not theirs being allowed to not say it in the same room as their own spawn. Dangerous ideas, right? I encourage you to start shit if they make you, though.

              I should clarify I’m Canadian, so this specific issue hasn’t come up, but I’ve seen similar things. For example, my local division has a policy, on paper, that pride flags should be flown in schools, but they often aren’t because the staff don’t like angry mobs.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I embarrassed the COO of a large organization once in front of approximately half of that organization’s management. Managed to get away with it. So yes, I can say with some certainty that being able to stand up and freely express yourself is character building and, frankly, fucking awesome.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s also a strength. Places where you can’t criticize things is how you end up with a the emperor has no clothes situation where harm gets perpetuated just because there isn’t psychological safety for people to feel comfortable to speak out.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Shit like this is why the kneeling protests in the states never bothered me.

      Nationalism is a fucking curse. It drives people insane. These guys don’t love our country enough. Those guys love their country TOO MUCH. Its all so miserable and awful for everyone involved.

      I’m proud to live in a country with freedom of expression.

      Freedom to say anything that doesn’t upset the rich and powerful. Freedom to speak anywhere that the police won’t arrest you and the corporations can’t ban you. Freedom to travel anywhere your credit card can afford to send you and the State Department hasn’t banned you from going. Freedom to express yourself in any way that some Christian Fundamentalist doesn’t think will unduly influence his little rugrats.

      Unlimited, Unconditional, Unparalleled Freedom (*)

      • Limits and Conditions still apply. Please consult your local boss or party apparatchik for further details.
      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Civil liberties are definitely something that have to be continuously fought for. You’re right that there are a lot of elements that would love to see many go away. Abortion is only the start.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even having an anthem, being bullied into putting your hand over your heart, making children onesie allegiance, is all indoctrination to nationalism. It’s horrible.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lmao ‘bullied’?

        They gave you swirlies until you caved, didn’t they?

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not singing loud enough - straight to jail.

      Surprisingly, singing too loud? Also straight to jail.

  • palordrolap@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah, an excuse to attack an organisation that worships something other than Mighty Xi and the CCP.

    Using children as the pawns too. Masterful.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Hong Kong has redoubled the emphasis on “patriotic” education since 2020 when China cracked down on the city’s pro-democracy movement.

    Officials said students’ voices at the Hong Kong and Macau Lutheran Church Primary School were “soft and weak” and “should be strengthened”.

    At Yan Chai Hospital Lim Por Yen Secondary School, teachers were told to “help students develop the habit of singing the national anthem loudly in unison”.

    Many former opposition lawmakers and democracy campaigners have been jailed since 2020 under a controversial national security law that criminalised all forms of dissent.

    More recently, it banned what has effectively been the city’s unofficial anthem, a protest song called Glory to Hong Kong, because of its “seditious” possibilities.

    In November last year, the bureau introduced a new subject which would require students as young as eight to start learning about the Beijing-enacted security law.


    The original article contains 508 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    For all her reputation of being the Iron Lady Thatcher really pussied out of standing up to china on this.

    Like could you imagine the difference if the UK had someone with some fucking backbone back then that didn’t sell Hong Kong to its Doom?

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      How is it Thatcher’s fault? I’m genuinely curious.

      I learned that Hong Kong is under British control because it’s a leasing contract that last 99 years (from 1898 to 1997). So when the time comes it’s nobody’s fault that Hong Kong went back to China. Because China at the time would never extent the contract or even except negotiations.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hong Kong itself as well as the Kowloon peninsula were actual territories that belonged to the UK after they were ceded to them after the opium wars.

        It’s only the “new teritories” which were several smaller islands surrounding Hong Kong island that were part of the 99 year lease.

        Even if no effort was made to secure the new territories, we could have and should have defended Hong Kong and Kowloon as part of Britiain, as the people wanted to be either independent or remain British.

        Thatcher rolled over and sold their futures to appease China.

  • nekandro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember getting scolded for not singing O Canada properly.

    Why is this even a story? This shit happens in schools because wrestling kids to do stuff is hard.

    Oh wait, I forgot, China bad.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Believe it or not, it happening in one country doesn’t mean it’s okay to happen in another country

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Believe it or not, there’s nothing wrong with telling someone to sing more loudly.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          In a normal context, I would agree with you but when louder singing is enforced by the State then I take issue with that.

          • nekandro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Is your principal not elected by the school board (a municipal government)? A superintendent?

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’d go in a different direction - requiring someone to sing your national anthem is wrong. It’s wrong when the U.S. do it, it’s wrong when Canada does, it’s wrong when China does it.

          I find national pride hard to understand, but forced displays of national pride are really iffy.

          • nekandro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Fair enough. I’m just saying that the fact that this is an article in the first place is because of “China bad,” not because it’s anything unique or special.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did a non-teacher, government official scold you directly? No? Ok, not the same thing then.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        non-teacher, government official

        Do Principals count? How about Superintendents? State legislators who pass these pledge mandates? What about the school cop who comes to get you after the teacher writes you up? Or the cop in the ISS classroom who holds you until your parents pick you up? Or the school administrator who processes your expulsion?

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Does the principle count, or do you consider that a teacher? What about the superintendent?

        People want to make a good impression on their superiors. There’s nothing wrong with that.