For folks that are unable to port forward on the local router (eg CGNAT) I made this post on doing it via a VPS. I’ve scoured the internet and didn’t find a complete guide.

  • ntn888@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Thanks for the feed back. I started out with that post I referenced in my article, which had fewer entries. It didn’t work. Caveat was although the online port checkers were reporting the port as open, it was not actually making through the tunnel!

    I actually solved it by asking chatgpt!! I put in the suggestions and it worked. I’m also no expert on creating iptables, but once it was in place it seemed self explanatory.

    I ran netcat as client-server to test it actually worked.

    • andscape@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Idk man, it seems pretty irresponsible to me to write a blogpost with stuff that you got from ChatGPT without understanding it. People will assume that if you wrote a blogpost on this then you know what you’re doing. ChatGPT gets stuff wrong all the time, and we’re talking about firewall configuration here. If it misconfigured some stuff it could leave you and your readers vulnerable to all kinds of shit.

      In this case it seems to me that (luckily) there’s just a bunch of redundant routing, but the next time it could be leaking your and your readers’ torrent traffic out of the VPN tunnel, leaving you vulnerable to legal repercussions for piracy.

      Please don’t authoritatively post stuff that you got from the automatic bullshit generator without understanding it.

      • ntn888@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I understand what you mean. It’s become a habit of mine lately, and I learn lots in the discussion to.

        In my defence I did run some tests and confirm it’s functioning.

      • ntn888@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I understand what you mean. It’s become a habit of mine lately, and I learn lots in the discussion to.

        In my defence I did run some tests and confirm it’s functioning.

        • andscape@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Look at the very least you should write in the blogpost clearly which parts are generated by LLMs, so your readers can decide whether to trust them.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I took a look at it. From what I understand, some of the lines in your setup are redundant. The final product seems to do basically the same job as mine. In any case, if it works, it works.