• Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland all the way, 120 hz Freesync monitor with 60 hz second monitor works perfectly on KDE Plasma with AMD. No fussing about with X11 configs or worrying about if the compositor is active or not, it just works.

  • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t bother choosing. Use whatever the distro gives you until you actually have a reason to switch

    • creation7758@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use arch btw. My distro doesn’t give me anything. I was on x11. Wanted to experiment a bit and now I’m configuring hyprland. Going well for me so far

  • burrito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland is the future. X11’s future is dead. Unfortunately there are still some growing pains. Xwayland mostly works but I have issues with it sometimes.

  • michaelrose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you don’t know install a distro and use what comes with it by default and only worry about digging into the plumbing if something doesn’t work for you.

    Ideally you let your distro worry about plumbing.

    I think Mint is nice if you don’t need bleeding edge stuff. You can use Cinnamon which runs x11 but will eventually support Wayland.

    I’ve heard good things about suse which has a rolling release option and supports gnome and KDE under Wayland.

    Arch of course is a thing if you don’t mind a manual transmission as it were.

    Personally I might pick Mint to get started.

    • jack@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No screen tearing out of the box is a huge plus for wayland. Makes recommending GNU/Linux much easier

    • imnotneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      hmm interested in the battery life comment. is this a thing? if I could push an extra 20 minutes or so I’d switch

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve also noticed a dramatic improvement in battery life with wayland. Been using it since F21 it’s very efficient imo

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wayland, because it’s faster, more stable, handles multi-monitor better, you can have animations while playing a game, no tearing, no fcking around window managers/compositors or shit, lower memory usage and 1:1 touchpad gestures

    • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      you have the same with X11… i have all these feats with my intel and AMD GPU.

      So why Wayland then? Better architecture/codebase and more manpower. And I think it supports multi-gpu better, not sure as nvidia doesn’t play well with Wayland, it would be astonish that Optimus works any better.

      • Presi300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Try running multiple monitors with different resolutions or gaming… Just in general (no seriously, people who think that gaming on X11 is better than wayland are fcking insane… No tearing, having to disable compositor to get more than 20fps, just works) in X, bet you’ll have a great time. And yes, Nvidia is the only reason why imo anyone should still be using X (if they don’t wanna use gnome)

  • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland. Because it’s X12. Not a spiritual successor to X11, but an implementation of a subset of X12 by the X11 people. The fact that X11 even works for desktop is a miracle, and only possible due to everyone deploying ass-backwards workarounds to make it work. Now the only changes to Xorg are related to Xwayland.

  • Ocelot@lemmies.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland first, but have both installed so you can fall back to X11 if you need to. If you do have to go back check wayland again after every few updates. X is dying a long-needed death. It started off has a hack decades ago and has just been held together with duct tape ever since. There are some not so great things in wayland with some apps, sometimes issues with context menus or screen recording for example, but they’re getting fixed over time.

    I do kind of miss x forwarding over SSH. It was really convenient, there might be something for wayland but I haven’t looked for a while.

  • Matej@matejc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both have issues, just that X11 has old issues that rarely someone is workin on, while Wayland has new ones and people are fixing them. So Wayland for me, thank you.

  • hitagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    X11. I heard NVIDIA is buggy on Wayland. Also, I’ve never really had much problems with X11 and my system setup.

    • aikixd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found that Wayland works better in my case: XPS 17 with Nvidia on Ubuntu lts. Less stuttering and overall smoother feeling. The only issue is that the screen doesn’t always turns on after suspend, but this is healed with ctrl+f1.

  • West Siberian Laika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland, especially with a laptop and/or a multi-monitor setup. It has a proper touchpad support with 1:1 gestures and setting different scaling factors for multiple monitors with different refresh rates is a breeze.

  • LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland. It generally works a bit better at this point, and it will only continue improving while X11 falls behind. I occasionally need to switch back to X.org for some legacy screen-casting or remote desktop apps, but even the ones that support Linux as an afterthought are starting to add beta Wayland support.

  • Juujian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland, but I mourn for X11. So many great tools, you could truly do anything. You’re just not allowed to have fun in Wayland :D