• alokir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a classics, but:

    • American Gods: they made unnecessary changes and introduced unnecessary filler plotlines until it felt like a drag to watch. The book already explored social issues, but the showrunners decided to dial it up to 100 and spoonfeed it to the audience at the expense of the actual plot.
    • Ready Player One: they dumbed down the whole thing about hunting keys and portals, removed tons of important worldbuilding details, made pointless changes that ruined the spirit of the books. They should have made it into a series instead of a movie.
    • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      What made me mad at RP1 movie was they put the Easter Egg in Atari Adventure. Which is mentioned in chapter 0 of the book, and again in the fake town (not put in the movie) because it’s so obvious, nobody who cared about games at all would hide anything there.

      And no Tomb of Horrors.

      Instead Spielberg put a bunch of lame movie references in, because he’s too senile to understand the game references.

      And the actors are far too pretty for the “but you’re beautiful inside” plot.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention the bastardization of the entire plot.

        I liked the book because it felt like the villains had actual capabilities to accomplish their goals. The protagonists did everything right and it still wasnt enough to get the bad guys off their backs.

        In the movie the protagonists make stupid decisions and the villain helper character which didn’t even exist in the book just overhears them talking about it.

        Fucking. Stupid.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And no Tomb of Horrors.

        That’s because the novel was about nerd culture in general, while the movie was almost entirely about video games. All the D&D, Rush, Monty Python, etc. references were absent. The Shining was in there because Kubrick was Spielberg’s mentor.

      • alokir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I won’t argue with the book being mediocre (I myself enjoyed it but many others didn’t), but it wasn’t a faithful adaptation at all.

      • macracanthorhynchus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Disagree. The movie is a mediocre adaptation of a fun and mediocre book into an un-fun and mediocre movie. The film was never going to be gold, but they spent an awful lot of CGI money to make a movie that wasn’t as fun as just reading the original and imagining all of the nerdy stuff being described.