• A Cool Dude@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if Reddit and the government paid billions to the creators to fork over the servers and to make the source code and apps proprietary?

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unlikely considering their source of funding comes from various European governments.

      Also, it’s not very easy to make open source closed source. The original Lemmy code and documentation is already out there. The only thing they could do would be to add new features that are all closed source. (This is what reddit does, as their old code is open source.) At best, it would be a fork of Lemmy with closed source elements.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s been established that you can’t call backsies on open sourcing your software.

      They could make new updates to lemmy proprietary, but what’s out there is already out there.

      • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They could make new updates to lemmy proprietary

        Maybe not even that. Lemmy is released under the AGPL3. This means that modified versions of Lemmy have to also be released as free software under the AGPL3 or a compatible license. To release a derivative work under an incompatible license you would need to own the code or be given permission by each contributor to do so. For any contribution where you can’t make a deal with the author, you would have to rip it out of the codebase entirely. Note that this is true for lemmy devs as well. If there is no Contributor License Agreement that states otherwise, they cannot distribute the work of other contributors under an AGPL3-incompatible license.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, I was thinking the “collective authors”; and to be fair, a small contribution could be replaced if tracked properly. If there’s no CLA and there are a lot of significant contributions by various individuals you’re absolutely right that it becomes impractical to the point that it wouldn’t happen.