I have been reading up on Chrome’s new Topics API and FLoC. Can someone explain to me why it is bad? Do the negatives of FLoC also apply to Federated Learning? (I’m not saying that FLoC is good, I’m just confused.)

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google’s data harvesting competitors no longer have a seat at the table for how data harvesting will work.

      As if governments are going to allow that. Google is already being investigated for their plans to disable third party cookies by other advertisers. That’s part of the reason why they’re doing this anyway. The rest of the ad industry has gathered behind their own standard, which is much more invasive. The British CMA has stepped in to make sure Google doesn’t remove first party cookies too soon, because that would impede other advertisers.

      Google wants to get rid of a large part of their data gathering system because collecting all of that data is a huge business risk, up to 4% of global revenue under the GDPR, but if they were to disable third party cookies tomorrow, they’d get fined to hell and back by antitrust lawsuits.

      I don’t really get why it’s “Tracking Cookies 2.0”. Data is stored and analysed locally and, from a technology point of view, allows for user customisation. Chrome doesn’t offer that customisation beyond offering the user the ability to remove a detected topic (get it together, Google!) but I can’t say I can see that much of a problem with giving websites a 33% chance of learning that I like computer technology.

      This is not to be confused with Unified ID, an attempt to standardise invasive tracking procedures, using PII as a source for generating identifiers. This includes “normalisation” of email addresses (so turning [email protected] into [email protected] to bypass people trying to find out who’s selling their email address).

      There are other Google technologies that are much worse; remote attestation of Javascript, for example, which is already in use in Safari, though it’s not as bad as Google’s proposal. The design and UX of Chrome’s FLoC implementation is also pretty shit. However, I think the privacy impact of the new system is drastically overstated.

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s yet another scheme to gather data about Chrome users for the benefit of advertisers. Aside from the fundamental problems with that whole idea which people most often point to, it’s also underhanded in a way that cookies, tracking scripts, and browser fingerprinting aren’t: It’s code that’s built in to the web browser itself which exists for no purpose other than to act directly against the interests of its users. It may be the first time that’s happened in such an obvious and unambiguous way.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Federated learning as a machine learning topic is unrelated to floc afaict.

    The issue I have with things like FloC and the topics API are that they are attempts to keep the cash flowing at Google before disabling 3rd party cookies, when it seems obvious that the time to disable 3rd party cookies is now.

    • tester1121@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the features on my Pixel that use federated learning don’t share the same privacy risks as FLoC?

      • mvirts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think not? I’m sure it still comes with some privacy risks, plus your phone is using power you paid for to train models owned by someone else I believe. What features are you thinking of? Lol I use a pixel as well

  • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All you need to know is its a proposal by Google for a new web standard. Enough said.

  • reboot6675@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is a pretty good breakdown and worth a read. Some key takeaways are that with FLoC Google would be able to track visitors to your website even if you were not using Google Analytics, and that the mechanism is built-in the Chrome browser so entirely controlled by Google.

    Here is a related article about Topics, the FLoC replacement.