I have a suite of services exposed using a reverse proxy (npm) protected with passwords, but I’m always a bit nervous that username/passwords aren’t enough – is there a way to set up 2FA either on Nginx Proxy Manager side or on, e.g., the 'arr suite of apps?

    • Gutless2615@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      authelia

      Ah that sounds like exactly what I’m looking for, actually. Thanks. Any tutorial you have that you can recommend?

    • FancyGUI@lemmy.fancywhale.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep! Authentik is my choice there, and it works flawlessly for my use-cases. The only thing that keeps me on my toes is still the celery dependency on redis that makes it not HA. They’re working on it and making me happy :)

    • kratoz29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a Synology NAS (my humble server) would that work with it too??? For example the DSM page (which I don’t have exposed).

      • Pfosten@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Synology’s DSM has built-in MFA support, though it also has some features for external identity management. I don’t think Keycloak and so on would be compatible though.

  • eximo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some systems support MFA eg vaultwarden. For that I use the built in MFA with Yubikeys.

    For things that are not MFA supported but I need them to be open I put them behind Authelia and Nginx Proxy Manager.

    Authelia config makes sense now. It was confusing at first however the custom config required on NPM still confuses me.

    Anything else stays off the internet and I can access via vpn back into my LAN.

  • rarkgrames@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not sure if it fits your requirements exactly but I just put a service behind TwinGate and it works well for my usage case. I can allow my wife secure access to services she needs to access from anywhere securely - she just opens the app to connect and she can access what she needs.

    I haven’t but you can enable 2FA, as well as restricting based on things like hardware, OS and whether a device has biometrics.

  • BetterNotBigger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re comfortable with using Cloudflare, you can use their zero trust tunneling and setup an application layer that adds auth to those services. I have mine protected by my GitHub login.

    • Gutless2615@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh interesting. I’m using zero trust tunneling already to get through my ISP network chicanery. How would that work? Do yo uhave any tutorials you can recommend?

      • BetterNotBigger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        cloudflare dash

        You can secure your tunnels using the Access menu and then adding an application. It should be somewhat straight-forward but you’re basically looking to create an access policy and then adding the rules you want. For example a simple one is to add an allow rule for certain emails. When you enter your email an access code will be sent to you before you can access the application resource. That’s just one of many ways to secure it using their application config and access policies.

    • kratoz29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to expose my Vaultwarden instance with it, but I think it didn’t work with the protected CF login.

      • BetterNotBigger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Likely because the apps need access to the host and the policies were likely blocking it since it’s non-interactive.