• endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently moved to Fedora and tried gnome first. Absolutely no thanks. I just can’t get down with it, and I had numerous issues in just a few days. KDE spin has been pretty painless.

      • penquin@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have the complete opposite experience. I’ve never had a good fedora kde install. It always had issues out of nowhere. I’ve hopped so much until I settled on endeavourOS for over a year now. Beautiful distro

          • penquin@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Could be. To be fair to fedora kde, I’ve only tried it on a laptop that has hybrid graphics Intel/Nvidia. I now have a desktop PC that is all AMD, but I built it with EndeavourOS and never anything else.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I kind of have the opposite experience.

        I use Plasma for a bit but instability, odd bugs, or visual inconsistency just becomes too much for me.

        Gnome was a pain for a couple of weeks when I kept trying to use it like a Windows PC, but once the Gnome workflow “clicked” it just made so much more sense than the Win95 UX paradigm.

        And it’s particularly annoying when kwin crashes, because it takes everything else down with it (that’s getting fixed in Plasma 6 though!) For me that’s an absolute show-stopper. I don’t want to lose hours of work across multiple programs because something caused kwin to crash.

        5.27 is better to a ridiculous degree compared to how Plasma 4 and early Plasma 5 was, though. KDE is doing a lot of work to put the meme of their software being a buggy mess to bed.

      • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you don’t mind me asking, was it because of the vanilla look, the customization being based on extensions (which may or may be updated for a while when a new version releases–if at all), or was it the Gnome philosophy of “One Window per workspace”?

        Just curious really, I’m more of an XFCE and KDE user myself, and i can see the appeal of Gnome (and I’m NGL, it looks nice IMHO), but yeah…not a big fan of extensions breaking every version update and the “throw unused Windows in a new workspace” thing

        • endhits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t mind the workspaces idea, but I’m just so used to a windows-like philosophy that I just can’t adjust easy.

          If I had one monitor, maybe gnome would be better. Workspaces could organize myself better. But I have 3, and almost never use other workspaces in KDE. And my mint XFCE laptop isn’t a big work machine so it doesn’t matter much.

          Also I had technical issues on gnome that didn’t happen on KDE.

          My first distro was pop, and their version of gnome I do like. But I’m not willing to customize it enough to suit myself. I’m more of a “stock experience with small mods” kinda dude. I do enjoy Unix porn but don’t have desire to do it myself. That’s kinda why I’m not a massive fan of xfce. The default layout is really bad.

          • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ditto. I’ve just never found the use for workspaces myself (like, i understand why they’re there but they never really worked for me). I tried them, didn’t like the flow of it, so i just ignored them (and Gnome for the most part, save Pop_OS, but I’ve a love/hate relationship with it cuz it’s always caused me problems when i try it out. Hopefully the Cosmic Desktop they’re making will run better on my systems) in favor of the windows philosophy myself

            Agreed on Vanilla/stock XFCE being rough (and i love XFCE), and vanilla Gnome being divisive, but i’m the opposite of you and love to tinker with my stuff–even KDE, which lools good OOTB i can’t just leave it alone lol

        • jack@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I only use one workspace and cycle through the programs with super+tab. IMO managing window placement is a waste of time

    • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, can’t you just make KDE plasma have the Gnome look, or…basically any look you want?

        • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I kinda getcha. Design-wise, you could get a very close copy (but I don’t think 1:1. Never tried it tbf), but if we take the workflow into account, yeah it won’t be 100% the same (also, QT apps can be a turnoff depending on the person)

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually installed 39 fresh on a asus gaming laptop and while before I had issues with multiple drivers not working correctly, this time it was incredibly painless and I haven’t has any issues with it.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bought a System76 Darter a few months ago, it had problems with the screen brightness controls and external displays on Pop_OS. Installing 39 has been a breeze with everythibg just working so far.

      • OboTheHobo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, fedora 38 is already on the latest version of KDE Plasma unlike with gnome. I’m sure once we get Plasma 6 we’ll see the fedora spin support it not long after.

  • GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I updated from Fedora 38 yesterday, and my Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 is working even better than before. The tool for controlling the discreet graphics card is working flawlessly now, unlike before. I would strongly recommend upgrading.

      • GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m talking about asusctl, supergfxclt, and rog-control-center which is a GUI front end for the previous two items. You can find lots of info and guides on it here.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Highly implore everyone to abandon redhat and everything and everyone that is associated with them.

    There’s nothing fedora does that other distros aren’t doing, and there’s no reason to run a distro based on a foundation that is now hostile to FOSS.

    • wolf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      First, Fedora is not Red Hat but their own community. (Although heavily sponsored by Red Hat) Second, Red Hat is FOSS.

      The ones hostile to FOSS are all the freeloading companies, which used the work of Red Hat to increase their own profit, w/o contributing anything back.

      If it is so easy, cheap and so much fun to support a stable Distribution for 10 years with backports for security vulnerabilities and drivers, I am very surprised that we don’t have hundreads of community distributions which do this.

      Finally, over the years Red Hat contributed a load of the things we take for granted now.

      (Writing this as a happy Debian user. I am just tired of reading this kind of bullshit again and again and again.)