To provision VMs yes, to configure them I think Ansible works best. But you can call Ansible from Terraform.

It’s probably both

You can use udev rules and systemd mount or AutoFs.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Udev
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd#systemd.mount_-_mounting

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Autofs

Yeah, because of US interference and the EU complacency on having a unified army/defense system, we’re absolutely not ready if the US went rogue with a guy like Trump.

It’s very worrying for the future …

It’s something we should have done back in 2016 already, heavily reducing our reliance on the US in cases like that. Be it militarily or economically. The EU can’t keep being the third player in whatever world we are heading right into.

It was definitely a headache for me as well, but you need a guest agent (like vmwaretools or qemu-guest-agent), a cloud init ready template for the distro of your choice, a cloud init config file (network/user/vendor) and a custom SCSI/ide cloudinit cdrom mounted at boot on your VM. You also can find cloudinit logs on your VM to try and figure out what’s missing or what went wrong.

I’d say less, because the movie makes itself completely clear that it’s a fable about power and greed.

Billionaires are a political choice as much as homelessness. They are allowed to exist because nobody does anything about it.

Cum jar and one guy one jar, I assume?

If you don’t know what they are, good for you, keep your innocence.

My Kindle never saw any WiFi connected to it. Everything goes through Calibre. I only read dead authors, so I don’t feel bad about pirating my books.
Sometimes I go buy used books at my local bookshops just because you should support your local bookshop.

Turns out they had a lot to lose. Who could’ve seen this coming? I can understand the despair of Argentinians but that was just accelerationism.

Lebanese civilians and Lebanese homes are Hezbollah. It worked in Gaza, why wouldn’t it work in Lebanon.

As far as I know, by tradition, Macron should have taken the NFP’s candidate as prime minister even though they only had a small majority. Then the assembly could have censored the government or not, basically triggering a new election if they did.
Macron, knowing what we want better than everyone else, took a shortcut by making shoddy alliances with the traditional right and the far right to name Barnier.

The only reason he refused to name Castet was because she wanted to reverse his retirement reform (which was also rejected by the far right, so it could have actually been removed). But the official communications were all about “nobody really won the election” or “it would be ungovernable”.

Macron is a child throwing tantrums because what he wants is best and he knows better than us peasants, he sees himself as a benevolent dictator, as in, he is making the tough decisions because he knows he’s right. And in our constitution, the president has extensive powers that allow him to act in such a way if he wants to, with basically no checks and balances but honesty and tradition.

And in all that, some members of his former government won seats at the assembly, and kept their positions as ministers too. So we had deputies-ministers, wrapping up the “urgent matters” and setting themselves up for their next jobs. They effectively wrote budgets that, they themselves will vote for in the next few weeks. That’s effectively breaking the separation of power

This is a counter argument to having a constitution that allows the president to do what Macron did. There are basically nothing stopping him besides tradition and good will.

The defense lawyers also tried the “rape” and rape defense bullshit. Arguing that if you’re not intentionally raping someone, it’s not rape.

I guess it’s their job to defend their clients but what the fuck is that kind of argument…

Oh yeah, because not wanting 90% of my country’s media to belong to 10 people, or have proper taxation for richer folks, or good use of my tax euros for proper free health care and education for everyone make me a Stalinist.

I’d absolutely rather have billionaire fueled propaganda against brown people and the poor, all the while they eat lobster and literally burn the planet to the ground. At least that’s not slightly leftist, right ?

Like the rich propping up fascists to keep their wealth and power ? That’s completely unheard of right ? It’s literally happening in France right now.

They hate them so much they even had dinners together!

https://www.liberation.fr/politique/chez-thierry-solere-les-diners-secrets-de-la-macronie-et-du-rn-20240709_XZA6N7NSXNHILFUMKMJ2KIF2VQ/

Classic liberal move, history somewhat repeats itself. They’d rather have fascists than leftists in power.

What a fucking trooper, I can’t even begin to imagine the strength it requires to go through with this.