Man, for someone who doesn’t know anything you sure do go on a lot about things you know nothing about.
Man, for someone who doesn’t know anything you sure do go on a lot about things you know nothing about.
Well, officially, Putin supports Harris, but who knows with that deranged man.
So first of all, that is “armchair conjecture”.
Second of all, you’ve already admitted just because Putin says it doesn’t mean it’s true.
Third of all, what is your reaction to Putin’s support? Sounds like “be careful of Harris, Putin supports her.” Do you think Putin is an idiot? He knows that’s how people will react.
Not supporting someone just because Putin said to is just as stupid as supporting someone just because Putin said to. Either way you’re letting Putin make your decisions instead of thinking for yourself.
Armchair conjecture is exactly what you’re doing
If you’re just going to quote people and accept it as fact, I have the metal scrapping rights for the Eiffel tower for sale and I’m willing to do so for cheap.
I think the proper translation is “Da, let us argue amongst ourselves comrades. American pig dogs do not understand Mother Russia.”
And yet he still wants more. It’s not enough to have most of the money, he needs to have all the money.
Only if you’re 10 years old.
Looks like gamers got comfortable with not owning Ubisoft games, just like he wanted.
You’re allowed to say gamer
I’m saying your comment of
Its impossible to step outside of the pure hatred. If you arent saying conservatives need to die then you get downvoted.
Doesn’t leave room for discussion.
He doesn’t have all the money. I have some money, Brazilians have money. It’s not enough to have most of the money and power if there’s more he can get.
No room for discussion
If you arent saying conservatives need to die
Well you sure sound like you’re leaving plenty of room for discussion.
You understand Google is banned in China because they wouldn’t accept censure right?
You understand that when people complain about that they argue that the law is bad, they don’t argue that Google should be allowed to ignore the law and keep operating anyway.
Democracy: has laws
Business: ignores the law
Democracy: bans business for failure to follow the laws
You: “is the authoritarianism?”
The only part in all of this where an individual is deciding what happens is where Elon Musk is deciding what should and shouldn’t be illegal. You are arguing for authoritarianism.
“Can people really be disagreeing with me?”
“No, it must be the hivemind.”
That’s true when they actually are a far-right Nazi.
We’re talking about the entire country of Brazil — 200 million people — being cut off from using X.
Companies that don’t follow the laws of a country don’t get to operate in that country. The entire country of the United States - 300 million people - are cut off from enjoying Kinder Surprise. Are you equally outraged about that?
When a company says “Lol, we’re not going to have a way for you to hold us accountable” then a country is obviously going to shut them down. They’re not going to let a company ignore their sovereignty like that.
If what these accounts said was so dangerous then why didn’t the government go after the operators of the accounts and arrest them?
Oh, is X willing to help them find the operators of the accounts? Or are you suggesting they do something impossible instead of something actionable?
If the owners of the accounts aren’t operating in Brazil (likely) then there is little Brazil can do to go after them. X is operating in Brazil, so Brazil has the authority to go after X if they refuse to do anything about it.
His motives are clearly to watch the world burn.
His motives are money and power. He is indifferent to if the world burns in the process.
Looks like a 3D puzzle with some minis in front of it.