Gnome likes to remove important APIs from time to time which leads to extensions being broken for an awfull long time after an update and also has all sorts of issues with QT apps, simply because Gnome devs do not want to bother with things they consider not important.
What’s your issue with KDE?
EDIT: Typos.
KDE is rock solid on my device, unlike Gnome. What do you mean by that exactly?
Getting a feeling there’ll be some uncomfortable ones
Nah, they’ll just ignore all the inconvenient questions.
deleted by creator
XED is amazing, but I don’t get it why they’ve changed the name. Previous was better, IMO.
No, unfortunately. It is just the first thing that came to my mind reading your requirements.
Raspberry Pi 5/400 with Waydroid? Just a thought.
I hope that LadyBird could become a viable alternative as well.
Only one calendar on free tier? Thanks, but I’ll just stick to the local one.
Too bad I’ve switched to KeePassXC already.
I wanna buy a PostmarketOS compatible device someday.
Sorry, I couldn’t resist. /j, obviously.
Both have nonfree stuff in there.
But flatpak’s backend is open source and self-hostable, while snap’s is proprietary and not self-hostable. Flatpak is the lesser of evils from this point of view.
Native apps will always be better, imo. I think less apps should use PWAs. No offense to those who use them, though. It’s just my personal preference.
This is why F-Droid exists.
In theory, I could just have a downloadable .apk for Android to circumvent the fee but most people don’t want to install a random .apk from the internet.
You could’ve considered F-Droid.
Soo, yeah that’ll probably not happen :(.
It’s sad. Anyway, good luck with future development!
Cool project! Is there any plans on releasing a mobile app in the future? I’m allergic to PWAs.
the most popular distribution still uses Snap
Ubuntu is the most popular? On server maybe, on desktop I doubt it.
Flatpak does not support CLI only applicatoins
It is not true. You can install Neovim as flatpak, for example.
Also some may like it more that Snap relies on AppArmor instead using the custom solution of Flatpak.
It only means, that on distros without AppArmor you get almost no sandboxing of snap applications.
The only advantage snap has is the ability to package drivers as snaps. Other than that there’s simply no reason to choose proprietary-backed snap over flatpak.
EDIT: Typos.
Why tho?