So you recognize the danger you’re putting yourself in by insisting you’d rather have nothing than only a little? That’s what I’m getting out of this frothing mess of a comment.
So you recognize the danger you’re putting yourself in by insisting you’d rather have nothing than only a little? That’s what I’m getting out of this frothing mess of a comment.
Oh they are are they? Better let the dude explicitly in favor of Israel’s approach win over the woman who wasn’t mean enough to Israel I guess. And fuck all the other points, we’ve got standards.
Man, idk if I’m mad or amused. You either don’t live in the US and your stance didn’t change anything, or you do and going by your pronouns you’re about to reap all the rewards.
When someone suggests the best solution to a genocide is making it worse, I’m going to call that person names, yeah.
Literally just flip a coin to get a better prediction. Randomized decision rule go brrr. Absolute madness. Neyman and Pearson can’t fool me. It’s all lies. Lies!
The only thing the article adds to the headline is that it’s not possible on new Intel chips. This article seems significantly better.
That sounds straight out of a comedy show.
Tbf it’s weird that boxes of gloves just have both pairs stuffed in them. I wouldn’t expect that, but I think I’d at least check.
Through a postcolonialist lens this is pretty clever. Use of civilized as a term to excuse the racist and expansionist actions of one’s own country, expansion which happens to have coincided with railways being central to industrial power. Now the colonized are civilized, are we the barbarians?
Unironically thinking like that is the real ape-brained behavior.
This reads different if the woman is an economist.
Where is this from?
Online dating in 2001? What was that like?
Sorry to disappoint but I’m only gonna benefit from official Republican policies, so… thanks? I guess? Was just trying to help you non-wealthy non-crackers.