I can only hope it was with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.
I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone else’s reporting on source documents.
I can only hope it was with a side of fava beans and a nice Chianti.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism
Because you clearly do not know what that term means.
Tangent story, I was in Manitowoc, WI, on a motorcycle trip. In WWII, they built submarines there, and they have a US submarine at a museum on the lake.
You might remember Manitowoc as being the area where Making A Murderer happened. Turns out that series only gives a light impression of the local accent there. The tour guide for that submarine sounded like he was speaking a completely different language from English.
I’m gonna go a different direction here.
Silencing propaganda is how it expands more.
You cannot stop propaganda. Some of it will always get in. Banning the position being propagandized demands that observers choose sides. Some portion of those people are going to actively seek out the propaganda message to “make an educated decision” (bOtH sIdEs) Some portion of those people are going to buy into the propaganda.
On the other hand, if propaganda is not silenced, the response will be one of showing it to be bunk. This would serve to make the propaganda less effective. Yes, some people will still buy into it, but fewer people than if it had been silenced.
Think about it like scam emails. You can see by the awful grammar and spelling and nonsense email address that it’s bullshit. The people who respond don’t. They are more likely to fall for it. Silencing propaganda in one place doesn’t silence it everywhere, but it does focus its message to people who are more likely to fall for it. They can then strengthen each other’s belief by association, and begin expanding on their own.
It’s why the big picture is that it’s one giant propaganda machine, but when you look closer, it’s a bunch of loosely or unrelated local “cells,” operating independently. Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Patriot Front, plenty of others nobody had heard of, and the (as yet) less violent collections like Tea Party, Freedom Caucus.
It is far better to answer propaganda than to silence it, but we do all have to agree, as individuals, that that’s what we do. The far-right has already decentralized, and reasonable people need to do the same thing. You don’t have to be a registered Democrat, you don’t have to approve of Biden; you can still contribute to having decisions in government made on the basis of objective reality. You may still not like the decisions made, but your differences will be political ones, and not ones of fact (for the most part).
Luckily, all it takes is standing up for your principles.
ACAB … including Sting.
Why the fuck isn’t one of his unemployed sons drive other people’s shit around for twelve hours a day instead of him?
Huh, kbin.social ate it then.
Edit: I’m seeing it there as “deleted by creator.”
I mean, it was a Black Lives Mystery march.
The protests, one of several in recent years meant to “protect” the National Electoral Institute (INE), come after Lopez Obrador sent a sweeping package of constitutional reforms to Congress, which would include an overhaul of the INE.
Yeah, they really should.
Edit: This was initially a response to someone else’s comment calling my “medial [sic] literacy” into question. That comment appears to have been deleted, and I’m not sure why this response became a top-level comment, but I’m leaving it.
Why the scare quotes? Seems like they’re turning out to actually protect the INE and democracy.
Law enforcement uniforms in a secular nation should not bear religious symbols.
Who’s not interested in whose opinion now?
That you’ve employed a slippery slope analogy far too widely?
I have also hired exterminators and taken antibiotics.
Application that arranges your Windows desktop icons by penis.
That’s just God telling you to go to the bad gateway.