I’ve got it. Since we’re worried about rising sea levels on earth, we can just pipe the excess water to the moon and flood the moon’s surface with water and use that for cooling.

All of this crap stems from one individual named Nils Bejerot, who was the anti drug guy for the government back in the day (he also coined the term Stockholm Syndrome, and was against comic books because he thought they would make children grow up to become violent). He considered drug use to be an infection in society that could spread from person to person, and the only way to stop the infection is a zero tolerance policy and to make society fear drugs. And oh boy did all that propaganda work. Still today, 36 years after his death. Through that lense, the article you mention “makes sense”. It’s incredible the effects one person can have.

As a swede: Word. It’s backwards as fuck here. The previous government didn’t even want to investigate whether or not to decriminalize, because doing so (investigate, mind you) would “send the wrong signals”. Yeeah fuck science and people’s lives when you have “signals” to worry about.

When you put it like that… Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to judge.

Even better, they have lava!

Did he grab a hold of you and slap you in the face while talking to you in human language?

Send a spy in to steal their floppy.

Sadly for us, they have the robustness of being perpetually offline due to being old and crappy. I’m sure even their internet is just standalone computers that you have to carry floppies between.

And when they are - it’s nothing to worry about since they’re not here anymore.

/s

Everything has context, and context matters. Your can look at any issue from different perspectives and through different lenses. From different perspectives, different aspects of the context might be of different significance, etc. As such, there could very well be a perfectly fine reason to say “stop targeting women journalists”. But that doesn’t, at all, mean other perspectives are invalid.

But fire has long been used in scientific experiments. You’re a lab rat.

The sex, gender, ethnicity etc of the victim, and the perpetrator, can give very important context that can point to very important issues that needs to be dealt with. If you’re alluding to the actual deaths of the victims being equally bad no matter their gender because they are all humans, then congratulations for passing the lowest threshold for human decency.

Wanting to end femicide doesn’t mean you value women more than men, it’s pointing to a specific issue. It also doesn’t mean that other issues doesn’t matter.

I’ll just say this: End femicide.

Most of us, actually.

Everything bad or inconvenient will be DOCTOR’S STOPPAGE!!

I’m very well aware. I frequent that server.

Curious downvotes on this one.

You could do that… But on the other hand… PROFITS!!1

Yeah, porn is the only reason I still visit Reddit from time to every day.