Add ground beef and worcestershire

The UK did that too

They were more comprehensive and generous, but the US did pay reparations to slave owners

um,sweaty,the us DID pay reparations

how were those slaveowners gonna recoup the losses of their property without reparations

If she’s running she doesn’t know what muenster is If she does know what it is and still runs, shes possibly insane and you are both better off

unironically buy bags of frozen veg and throw them into the broth, let it heat back up, then throw noodles in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

You could buy almost 1/3rd of a numetal t-shirt with that $10!

Do you consume drinking water

Most dish cleaners are like, bleach-based. As long as it was something that could be killed with bleach and hot HOT water/air, I really could care less

Thats why there’s a thing called the legal system, where they use (mostly) legitimate authority to fairly prosecute people in a way that respects their rights

Some thug walking around attempting to be judge, jury, and jailhouse yard all at once because someone did something they dislike is some Mad Max Spaghetti Western garbage

I mean, fully rejecting empathetic governance in favor of pseudodictitorial violent threat by violence doers is one way to look at things. It even lead to the fastest growing (and shortest lived) empires of the 20th century!

easy there Frank Castle

It would honestly affect them more if they were banned from the park, that is the scariest thing in the world to them

‘Consequences of their actions’ would be removal from the park and subsequent ban, not having to go to court to sue the person who assaulted them for injuries and damages

Disney has security guards. Disney has security cameras. Disney has jurisdiction to have people removed from the park. Disney has the right to have people charged with crimes they committed (with evidence from previously mentioned guards and cameras). Disney does not need people to do their job for them, they can literally handle it themselves.

99% sure that ‘others’ would prefer it be done by somebody that is trained, officiated, and legally responsible for their actions rather than watch some self-proclaimed vigilante justice dealer attack someone else

Responding to simple assault that doesn’t involve you with assault and battery IS acting violent

That person has (at max) assaulted the child, not the observer

Acting violent to those you find mildly annoying is an actual disorder (intermittent anger disorder), I’d get it checked out before you end up doing time my brother

IT finds a solution and applies it

Tech bro sells a solution and never references it again