I just switched to lineage and the settings are still raw.

Phew. For a second I was concerned for the dog. The internet is a dark place

1. Flashlight - to find my shotgun in the dark.

2. Shotgun - Im going to cobain me out of this shit

First I wanted to contradict and say that I like arch linux because it feels good… So yes: I see your point

In aisle three da steht ein Röööselein, und das heißt Cooorona! 🎵

Hey, we have strikt rules on a highway! For example if you’re driving slower than everybody else and your IQ is under 70 you are prohibited to drive on the right lane even if it’s empty.

As a hedonist my answer is yes. Life doesn’t have an actual point. It wasn’t “made” on purpose but because it got the chance. What you make of it is your decision but since we have a brain that rewards us and a nociception that punishes us depending on how we use our life I suggest you choose your own purpose. Mine is to be happy. Even when I’m altruistic I’m secretly egoistic because I feel better when my environment feels good too.

DuolinGon

I fixed it

Megaloblatta Longipennis

…of them.

I said the last sentence two times for emphasis.

Yes, but different mites. Their lifespan is too short. Horses however have to endure years of farting.

deleted by creator

Is she preganent?

You can’t 100% complete it.

The AI is stupid af.

NPCs tend to stand in your way.

Most NPCs have terrible design.

Somebody broke the weather mechanics.

Worst. quests. ever.

The grind is meaningless and unrewarding.

If I kill something I’m the bad guy.

No respawn.

Also bugs. Literally.

Don’t you dare!

1000 should be enough. 1000 qurans aren’t enough for the whole swedish country as well.

How about hard, angry, rough, degrading love?

I think there are three main problems, that aren’t considered properly:

1. Deep sea mining is not intended and will not replace mining on the surface. If anything we will mine more cheaper and with additional impact on the environment.
2. The deep sea and the ecological environment remains widely unknown. We could be attacking species we don’t even know and kill animals, that are essential for ecosystems. If we take the nodules we also take the only solid ground in this muddy depths we know so far. Which leads to my third problem -
3. The amount of time those species need to grow is gigantic. Everything is slower with reduced sunlight, so is growth. You simply can compare the ocean ground with forest in that it takes up to or even more than thousand years (estimated) to regrow. Some squid species need 4 years just to breed their eggs. Microbiology is slowed down just as dramatically. This leads to the assumption that we won’t kill for regrowing, but for good. Deep sea mining robots might cut dead strips into the ocean that will never recover.

I completely understand the economic argument and the worldwide hunger for resources, but money can’t be the final answer and reason for our actions especially when will still don’t use the current resources like we value them.

Also reasoning with environmental issues, like the need of rare elements sounds really counterintuitive considering we “kill ecosystems to protect them?”

If we would really care for the environment we would recycle, but we want this materials cheap and that is the only reason we try to get this working.

Why would the pope think that?