The short answer is no but the longer answer for what happens in each situation was detailed here: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/1051
lemmy -> kbin = pretends to send but doesn’t
The short answer is no but the longer answer for what happens in each situation was detailed here: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/1051
lemmy -> kbin = pretends to send but doesn’t
Just to add another concrete example, I saw a toot recently that .af
may be risky, as some countries are beginning to implement embargoes; the person who had a domain there may be losing it soon
He did say it would be “federated this week” but in the next comment in that issue he made he said that changed “but it turns out it’s not easy, and I wouldn’t want to make such a big change hastily”. I don’t think anything has happened since. I definitely almost never see any reduces over here on a different kbin, so I think it’s still the same. There is still some discussion in that issue, someone just posted they have a PoC of doing it in a fork for instance.
There’s some relevant discussion here and in the thread linked by ernest in that post here. I don’t want to give any wrong information, but I don’t think activitypub has a spec for downvotes/reduces/dislikes, just likes and shares (boosting). So on mastodon dislikes definitely aren’t federated. I believe for lemmy, they federate between lemmy instances that have them enabled, but for kbin they are local to your instance.
I am not toooooooo sure; I’m not familiar with lemmy myself. You could try adding the scheme before it, so: https://lemmy.world/c/beebutts or perhaps go about it the long way with url linking [lemmy.world/c/beebutts](https://lemmy.world/c/beebutts)
lemmy.world/c/beebutts
Heads up, the last link in your post has an extra .com
One thing I’m trying to keep an eye on is sup. Not much information at all besides a snippet of 1 to 1 encrypted messaging for activitypub, but the tidbit of working with any fediverse account is interesting. Potentially that could help deal with the different fediverse implementations of messaging. Of course, like I said, this is just me making up assumptions, it could not work the way I envision it at all. The creator just posted something 5d ago about it with “soon” though, so I’m hoping to read more about it