Except they can be hosted by the person/company making the software. This always seemed more trustworthy than AUR to me.
Of course there are also community PPAs that would need the same scrutiny as AUR packages.
Except they can be hosted by the person/company making the software. This always seemed more trustworthy than AUR to me.
Of course there are also community PPAs that would need the same scrutiny as AUR packages.
Tab groups for the friendly name at the top of a set. Edge implemented vertical tabs. Not as good as tree, but better than across the top.
I used to use Chrome at work. When Edge added vertical tabs I jumped to that immediately.
Now that IT is allowing FireFox I switched to that with Tree Style Tabs. I am missing the tab groups from Edge, but the tree is worth it.
Yes tree tabs with groups would indeed be perfect.
I’m subscribed to https://bugalert.org/ RSS feeds, but it seems they haven’t had any activity since October last year.
Does anyone know what happened to them?
Would Truenas fit as immutable? I guess it doesn’t stop you from changing things, but doing so might break the next update.
Configuration can be exported. Disaster resolution of fresh install and restore configuration has worked for me. No data loss and even the Virtual Machines started right back up.
From the picture, it’s just the context menu key with a new key cap.
The video made it look like this was the context menu key. This may just be a key cap change for WHQL certification of keyboards.
I’d go for remoting in as not root as the first (and maybe only) step for better security.
From there, running the services in VMs would probably be the next step. Docker might be better, but I have gotten into that yet myself.
As for hypervisor, KVM has worked great for me.
Welcome to the community. As you can see, there are some that are quite helpful and others that are … less so.
I agree with you that there should be a better way to do that. It’s been a while, but I’m pretty sure the Chrome deb file handled all of that for you. I’ve always been confused why every company that sets up their own PPA didn’t do that.
I would do it by manually splitting it up into sets and writing scripts to back up each of those sets. Then you only have to figure out the split once.
I wonder if rsync has an option to do what you are asking for?
It also sounds like the kind of thing the old tape backup software would do. Maybe look into something that can pretend the drives are tapes.
The kernel has drivers for very old hardware. It was news last year when support was dropped for i486. That is a 25 year old CPU.
I think they’re expecting thunderbird users to use POP instead of imap, Gmail integration, OWA, or other protocol that expects the mail to stay on the server.
Leaving the mail on the server has been great in Thunderbird since the Mozilla days. I did jump to Gmail web app a long time ago though. I’m assuming Gmail support has improved in the last 15 years?
A more detailed version of the dots in the scrollbar.
It’s quite useful files that are thousands of lines long.
Why that log? Because it’s 15+ year old code.
Is the windows partition is still there? You may be able to use one of the repair options from the install media to re-add windows to EFI instead of a full reinstall.
Thanks for the detailed reply. I’ve seen mentions of authentication over the years, but the conclusion from every thread like this was that it was nearly impossible to setup.
This doesn’t sound too bad.
Yes, displaying the wrong user is a symptom of it not enforcing security.
I’m not sure what idmap is. Does it allow the user numbers to be translated per folder?
Consider this setup: Two users on the server, Bob: 1001 and Jane 1002, and they have each been given ownership and exclusive access to separate folders.
Then you mount that to another machine where the user numbers are swapped. In that case, Bob gets Jane’s files and Jane gets Bob’s files.
Or worse, someone else on the network connects to the share with the 1001 user number. Then they get access to all of Bob’s files. This can be prevented by limiting access to the share from a single IP.
Keep in mind that NFS only does what you want if the user numbers and group numbers match on both systems.
I think that’s what the kerberos is there to solve. I’ve heard that it isn’t that bad to set up. I haven’t tried and just stuck with SMB.