None I could find, spraypaint those 3 out at least >.< I’ve no idea on the other countries accuracy my bet is that graphic is pre 2017 at the least cause the enterprise was decommissioned that year.

And the bonhomme Richard basically got arsoned in port. The enterprise is definitely out of it since 2017, this graphics full of bs.

That’s rpm, suse Linux 1.0 was never built off the same source or installer that Redhat Linux was.

Do you have a historical example where any suse distribution used redhat based source? As opensuse as I said only used the rpm package manager, it never used any other components of a redhat derived install.

Source: I work there and can find zero redhat strings in any old source code from that era, the old greybeards took offense to the implication that suse was ever based on redhat other than using rpm which at the time was about it for packaging.

All they did was start to use rpm instead of tar for packaging.

Opensuse and fedora have no common history though? Just because it uses rpm doesn’t make it a red hat derivative.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg

Dam freckle cultists and your freckle secrets.

So how many people knew about this shared freckle badge? I apparently am defective as I didn’t get stamped with it at birth, maybe my mom forgot to check that option at the dealership. Maybe this means I’m a reptilian or am a member of the illuminati. Or who knows maybe I sliced it off in my youthful escapades and shenanigans. Oh well, just another club I’m not a member of.

Seems to be working I don’t see any goo in there.

Soooo is it good? I kinda think its gotta be good least better than pizza with pineapple but I hate pineapple so I am biased

I use arch, err nixos/nix on macOS btw. Do I win or have I made the Linux nerds angy?

Yeah this only really applies to Algol style imperative languages. Dependent types and say stack languages like idris and apl are dramatically different in their underlying axioms.

Why use many word when few word do trick.

Their sprocket based economy next?

I attack the darkness.

Its deprecated kinda like `` should be $() https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu_chap02.html seach for arithmetic expansion or $[].

On ye olde hpux this would work, especially when you did rm-fr /$var and $var was unset and nobody unit tested their shell back then. That db server ran for 2 days though with open file handles before it finally died.

Is fash like that fish shell only more fetch? zsh is obviously the best, its the omega end to shell names with the z (in latin alphabets so there).

Key here is the outer [] and interaction of $[], test doesn’t have == by default in standard posix, so no this isn’t posix shell or bourne compatible. Tis but another bashism. I could probably force zsh into a more bourne mode to try it but its definitely not portable bourne shell its bash.

$ [ $[ $RANDOM % 6 ] == 0 ] && echo rm || echo ok
zsh: = not found
$ zsh --version
zsh 5.9 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

== should be -eq for this to be posix/bourne portable, you could use = but -eq is for numeric comparisons so not quite right.

Jokes on you, I use zsh, your silly bashisms have no power here.

I mean it’s like a built in parentheses from a functional pov. Saves parsing out what bag of words is grouped.