It’s called “passing a bunch of money around at the top.”
You think earning less than 100k is in the top earning block lmao.
They shouldn’t let people this dumb comment.
How about instead of tearing down something, you post something of substance.
How much do you earn? What do you do? How much is your rent?
And what is the maximum amount people are allowed to earn before they can criticize expensive living
Removed by mod
I’m stating the difference between an invader and a civilian distinctly.
Your inability to address what I’ve said isn’t my problem.
I dont think I have to answer that to say it is wrong to starve children to death.
Yea, if an invading force is slaughtering people to conquer your home, they are no longer just civilians. They are active combatants.
How many Israeli children starved to death yesterday?
Nazis had children too and didn’t justify the actions of the Nazis.
You don’t counter coping techniques. It’s not a logical stance and will not be countered by logic.
Gish gallop.
You made an absolute out of genocide and then kited right past the fact your original stance was an absolute acceptance of genocide despite the obvious other answers.
You will not stop clawing to justify the genocide, I don’t care to continue debating genocidal nazis.
We call this, projection.
You can’t come to terms with the hate and slaughter you support, so you project your guilt to others.
The implication of your proposition is that only genocide can decide this.
Your assumption is ludicrous and fascist. It says everything that needs to be said about your beliefs. By assuming only bloodshed is the solution, you remove the responsibility for you to face the genocide you are supporting.
I would have a criminal investigation and follow-up to this genocide similar to the Nuremberg Trials.
I want the people responsible locked up for life, and I want freedom for the people of Palestine.
So how about you? Can you honestly answer what exactly you want out of this?
Removed by mod
If you truly believed this, you would be offended by the political use of rape to justify the genocide of children.
You don’t want to engage what my comment actually said, the fact that a single rape in the face of genocide does not an article make.
My comment was about the focus on this crime as an individual act justifying genocide and you want to refocus back to the singular act while not really addressing the editorializing of NYT.
You are playing the game the genocidal people want you to play instead of engaging this propoganda meaningfully.
Civilians don’t typically hang out in occupied territory.
You’re still a nazi bro?
We also don’t call Nazis victims when they face retaliation for their crimes against humanity either.
Starving children is not a military operation.
You’re full of shit.
civilian collateral damage
Nazis can fuck off.
This is exactly what I’m calling out, using individual crimes to justify genocide.
You won’t even accurately address the crimes because they are so heinous.
We are talking about genocide. Starving children is in no way a military operation so you can suck that lie back up your ass.
Now, write an individual article for each child starved to death or bombed by Israel. I can’t muster the energy to care about a single rape in the middle of a genocide.
We have rape kits in Texas that have gone untested for over a decade. If rape was important to the people enacting justice, we have a long list to get through before we can start worrying about rapes in warzones.
But justice isn’t the intent behind articles like this. They want to justify the genocide with individual crimes.
I dont think you addressed anything in my comment.
Okay, professor. What is the exact maximum people are allowed to earn and exist in high expense areas?