• 1 Post
  • 543 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlnot underdeveloped
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The meme doesn’t make sense to me either, but I can tell you that the person in the second panel is Michael Parenti, a highly regarded communist historian known for analyzing history through class struggle. The quote in the 3rd panel is a famous one from his lecture about the US War against Yugoslavia:

    Africa is rich! Only it’s people are poor. There are still problems in Africa today, there are still outrageous things happening today. ‘“Building your own pharmaceutical factories in Sudan” where do you think you can get off where you think you can do that, when you should be buying from the multinational pharmaceutical.’

    Take the case of India. India was a rich, advanced, developed country. Until the British went in 1800. Between 1800 and 1830 the Indian textile industry, which was outperforming the British textile industry, was dismantled and the great industrial centers were de-industrialized. The people were sent back out onto the land to grow cotton for the factories in Manchester and London. Between 1850 and 1900, the per capita income fell by 65%. So that poverty in the third world, that so called ‘underdevelopment’ … These countries are not underdeveloped, they were overexploited- they’re maldeveloped.


  • I became a socialist because I was an “essential employee” during the height of the pandemic. I was treated like shit by my company, the customers, and the government while they sung my praise. I watched my grandpa get good cancer treatment with the VA (shocker, I know, but it happens) while my sister and grandma had to fight insurance for cancer treatment.

    We can’t make a perfect world, but we can make a better one. And it starts with a socialist economy.














  • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlDMCAtendo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    If game companies stood to make no money, why would they bother with such a large production?

    I’m a games industry professional. I would continue to do this work as an unpaid job if my basic needs were met on a societal level.

    You think you’re asking a neutral question, but you’re not. Companies operating within capitalism will behave in the interests of capitalists. IP laws aren’t required for the AAA studios other than to domineer control over an idea. A game like Call of Duty is a titan made by 1000s of professionals. One of those games gets launched every year. By shear force of momentum, there are very few companies that could ever replicate it in any fashion.

    Now imagine if COD was made by a company in which IP didn’t exist, all the profits went to the workers rather than shareholders, and that the workers have a say in the launch schedule. Would you be willing to pay for a game in that instance?