Great non-ideological analysis.

So you‘re saying Coy‘s analysis so precisely defines capitalism it amounts to calling for its abolishment and therefore contradicts the Times‘ official stance?

How is it even possible. We‘ve been killing them forever, and never seen a baby shark?

thelazy.org agrees!

Ah, of course that changes everything. Throw the old men in jail

Interesting! It‘s the opposite with me, I am not a native English speaker, and I actually didn‘t understand blood-shod. They limp and have blood in their shoes? The pictures that came to my mind reminded me of the Borchert poem. It felt like the adequate reply. I love it for the explicit message: Sag Nein! The horror at its end I find just as horrifying as the Owen poem. Back to back, and we have snapshots of the horrors of WWI, WWII and WWIII.

https://www.bo-alternativ.de/borchert.htm

so if I go to Britain, rob a home, take the loot out of the country and sell it there, it‘s all good?

Ah, of course it’s China escalating the trade wars.

Not yet. But they do it just in case

It wasn‘t about that of course. I don‘t understand why you’d want to call that person that. Because you think what he said is garbage?

„garbage person“ wow, well done. I wouldn‘t want you on my side

Maybe it‘s a legalese explanation of a problematic aspect of the fediverse though. When a commercial entity comes in that deals in people‘s data, which doesn‘t just store data on its servers, but creates a product out of the data. And it seems like it can do that here without you ever agreeing or even knowing about it.

why should it be ok that Meta collects this information though?

„They should take care of their own.“ This is at best a naive sentiment. They’re on planet Earth after all. Also, because they’re in Africa, doesn‘t mean other African nations will treat them favourably. Economic interests in this area are huge. That ECOWAS will act in the interest of the people of Niger is highly doubtful.

is piped still working for anybody?

According to this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Sweden the phase out was already stopped in 2010, confirmed in 2016. Also here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Sweden I can see no significant rise in fossil fuel production when nuclear did go down.