• HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We currently produce more than enough food and clothes for every person on this planet and could easily house them all.

            The problem is that because of capitalism we can’t get what everyone needs to them because it might hurt someone’s profits.

            • angrystego@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, but even if we used the resources better, we would still come to a limit, just later. Eternal population growth is nonsense.

              • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                With proper logistics that becomes less of a problem when coupled with universal education and healthcare.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              We have also destroyed most of the wild ecosystems of the world to grow that food.

              • Lmaydev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                But we can grow much more environmentally friendly foods if we choose to.

                The way we do things is not the only or even close to the best way.

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s still a limit. The Earth cannot support infinite humans.

            • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              this is the reality no one wants to admit because it points out a major flaw in the human psyche… that is, the ability to lack empathy by distance. the farther away people are, the less we care about them.

              this is obvious is every facet of our daily existence, and is provable by the lack of dense conservative centers and how easily swayed those brought physically close to those remote entities (mentally or physically) become empathetic.

              humans suck, and we are the cause of resources not going where they are needed.

    • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Infinite growth is inherently incompatible with life. It does not work. The biosphere is under immense pressure already. Humanity extinct 4 species every day and has killed off 90% of wild animals in the last 100 years. Nature is the greatest repository of knowledge that we have. It is invaluable to our science, though we treat it as expendable. It’s like burning all libraries. We are simply using too much land in an effort to support a shitty economical model that is based on population growth, forever. This is the kind of problem that humanity has proven to be ineffectual at solving. Long term and noone will take action unless it blows up in their faces, personally, right now. Let the next generation deal with it. That is what they said in the 50s and that is what they will say in 10 years too. The damage done to the biosphere is practically permanent. Once an animal or plant is extinct, it is gone. Once enough of them is gone, the planet no longer supports complex life.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t need to be using resources the way we do. It’s again a result of consumerism.

        We could easily support a way bigger population if we used resources better.

        If we stopped worrying about money so much science would easily be able to fix many of these problems.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We use a huge amount of resources shipping millions of tonnes of plastic toys around the world.

            That is not a natural thing that we have to do to live. It’s a choice.