• logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    29 days ago

    The toilet break was described as “urgent”.

    I’m surprised that they don’t have some contingency plan for this sort of thing. You know, like radio ahead and have a substitute conductor waiting at the next station. Because shit happens.

    Maybe they do have a contingency plan and it failed.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    29 days ago

    But there might not have been any major inconvenience to passengers, as trains continued to arrive and depart at the same intervals as usual.

    This is a big thing. They come every 5 minutes going every direction in Seoul. No one checks the schedule before they get on.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The benefits of such a high frequency really makes transit so much more user friendly. In my area we only have buses, and risking waiting a full hour or more if you miss your bus cause it was a tad early sucks a lot and isn’t even trying to compete with the convenience of a car.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        28 days ago

        The high frequency is essential, and definitely the part you notice when you travel functional cities

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    28 days ago

    If they need the toilet, they will have to use the restrooms in the stations, which are not near the platforms.

    Sounds like a planning mistake…

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    But there might not have been any major inconvenience to passengers, as trains continued to arrive and depart at the same intervals as usual.

    Looks like it was fine, none of the riders would have even noticed.