Let me know when the keel fails and the whole thing breaks in two.

I’m one that finds the GNU/Linux naming annoying. I think calling it that is mostly silly, and am mostly annoyed at people who militantly argue it’s the only way to describe a Linux OS (which aren’t as common as they used to be).

To me, it’s just overly verbose and pointless. For the most part, the GNU part has been implied for pretty much any mainstream form of Linux for decades. And even if it wasn’t, who cares? Like, you wouldn’t say that you run KDE/X11/wpasupplicant/neovim/docker/pacman/paru/systemd/GNU/Linux… Just saying KDE on Arch Linux is simpler and far more informative.

I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.

Pretty sure this isn’t real guys. There’s no “Do not thaw pizza” clause.

That design is awful

That’s assuming that they’re authentic and not propaganda pieces…

Reminds me of ones like “You’re one fry short of a Happy Meal”, or “You’ve lost some marbles”. They generally imply that you’ve lost or are missing some mental faculties.

I’ve used Authy for years now without issue. Seems it’s not a popular option anymore.

Is there something I should know about? Or are other options much better now?

I’m enjoying Connect while I wait for Sync to be released.

(As a former Sync/RIF user)

Weird hill to die on…