GunnarRunnar

Honestly, I wholeheartedly support this move. For a couple of (obviously subjective) reasons:

• Lemmy/kbin isn’t ready. If Beehaw staff were able to fork their own version of the base code with their moderation etc. design preferences in mind, this would be another thing – though even then it might not be enough to be worth it with the headache of fediverse moderation.

• Closed system/community is more personal, hence more productive and less noisy. At least before it outgrows itself.

What I’d hope but is also more work and potentially creates conflicts, is that the new platform provides good moderation logging etc. Which I think is key feature to ensure trust and self policing.

How is dismissing a correction with a blunt “nope” nice and tacking on etymology when we’re talking about modern use of the word?

Yeah what kind of linguistics dweeb doesn’t understand that language is fluid and shapes with time and location.

Emotions motivate everyone.

It’s insulting and counter productive to say this thing is about dumb people following their emotions when education, money and opportunities play such a big part.

If I’m sure about one thing, it’s that people are disgusting. I’d much rather avoid touching the door after using the toilet when my hands are clean. And even in the case that the door is disgusting, you can wash your hands both before and after.

It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.

I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:

• the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
• there is a legal obligation to keep that data;
• for reasons of public interest (for example public health, scientific, statistical or historical research purposes).

Source: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/dealing-citizens/do-we-always-have-delete-personal-data-if-person-asks_en

Well he is wearing a hat with hands.

You can’t delete your account if you’re banned? Seems a bit iffy.

If I’m 64? No way. If I’m 30? I don’t see why not.

Mint flavored all the way through, baybeh!

Yeah. I looove the diarrhea I get from eating tubes of mint toothpaste.

So that’s why Elon Musk made those scientists invent a flamethrower.

Do the AI scrapers use FediBuzz or just the same method as FediBuzz? If the latter, couldn’t the servers just issue a private API key (or whatever, I’m not that tech savvy) for FediBuzz?

Unfortunately, Mastodon is killing FediBuzz in its next 4.2 update.

Any idea why they’re doing this?

Thats what goes for mild inconvenience these days.

Heh, I can appreciate that. Just commented so nobody will use that as a justification why fines shouldn’t be based on revenue.

For real, it’s ugly and way too bright and fucking stupid but whoever had a week to create x-shaped disturbingly blinking sun did an okay job imo.

Aren’t there usually minimum fines anyway even if they’re based on revenue?

So those things only matter as search engine discoverability right? Doesn’t Google cache and keep them for pretty long though, so does it matter if user deletes their old content?