The U.K. paper confirmed it had removed the letter because of its sudden surge in popularity on TikTok and other social media sites.
The U.K. paper confirmed it had removed the letter because of its sudden surge in popularity on TikTok and other social media sites.
What I meant is censorship in terms of opinions on topics. We should be presented with both sides imo
I should have written it in a clearer manner
There is no “both sides”, there is an infinite amount of opinions and perspectives on one thing: reality. Not all of those opinions are worth engaging with or deserve a platform.
Though in this case with the letter it’s historically significant and I find their reasoning kind of pathetic, so I agree with you here.