• Beelzebabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t the convenient (and cheaper) situation here not be to rent, but to own and hire a handyman when needed? I’m just not sure how a landlord offers any kind of convenience to anyone. (Maybe there’s something I’m missing of course.)

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are absolutely correct, but it still requires making calls, coordinating with a handyman, being available when they come by, etc. It’s the same logic for why some landlords hire property managers. If being a landlord is so easy you’d think they wouldn’t need to hire someone to specifically manage their properties.