A Hong Kong court ordered the liquidation of China Evergrande, the world’s most indebted property developer.

Evergrande has assets of about $245 billion, but owes about $300 billion.

Its demise is a “controlled collapse,” but still raises systemic risk and will hurt investors, says an analyst.

  • DdCno1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem is that those ghost cities aren’t actual cities. The housing is largely worthless and uninhabitable, crumbling before it’s even finished, often only “finished” to look that way from afar. You can’t actually do anything with it other than tear it down.

    • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It looks to me like there are a fair amount of finished homes with fine construction that are vacant due to this whole thing. Many weren’t completed but many were.

      • DdCno1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fine construction? Based on what? Have you actually seen these ghost cities? There is nothing fine about them.

        • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Based on scanning wiki and a couple articles and seeing nothing about construction quality aside from unfinished projects, definitely not an authority

    • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh I see, didn’t realize the construction quality was terrible:( So it was a sham the whole time? I thought they just didn’t think through the locations which made the housing useless (no work within reasonable commute).

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The whole thing was essentially a real estate Ponzi scheme where new investors were paying for pre-existing work, from what I’ve read

        • DaDragon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          New investors were covering existing loans you mean!
          No Ponzi scheme here, nothing of the sort. Just good old economics!

          But yes, they sold apartments and used the proceeds to finance existing, already sold buildings that weren’t built yet.