The covert operation, described by U.S., Iranian and Israeli officials, is heightening concerns that Iran is seeking to turn the West Bank into a flashpoint in its shadow war with Israel.
Sadly doesn’t prove they’re Israeli plants, as the other user had noted below. I’m sure you know what you are and aren’t responding to. My source from Stanford paints a different picture qualitatively (and quantitatively, and is newer), but that’s a personal interpretation of the sources.
So by not entirely wrong, you’re saying something is wrong?
Sure, the source I found mentions nothing of Fatah, only the Palestinian Authority, and with the vast, vast majority unhappy with the PA, you can’t really call them “Israeli plants”.
I’m leaving it with the note that I can prove it’s at least PARTIALLY correct. The statement is overblown, and Fatah may be just as disliked, I just don’t see a source as definitive as the bit about the PA.
This is… An odd standard. So am I to understand that if part of a comment is deemed partially correct (and accompanied by verifiable misinformation) this is not removed? Seems like a lack of enforcement to me, and that the comment should be corrected at the very least. But if this is traditionally how things are done here, then I suppose this is what I should expect moving forward.
Personally, this seems like a less than sneaky way to avoid the rules of the sub.
Sadly doesn’t prove they’re Israeli plants, as the other user had noted below. I’m sure you know what you are and aren’t responding to. My source from Stanford paints a different picture qualitatively (and quantitatively, and is newer), but that’s a personal interpretation of the sources.
So by not entirely wrong, you’re saying something is wrong?
Sure, the source I found mentions nothing of Fatah, only the Palestinian Authority, and with the vast, vast majority unhappy with the PA, you can’t really call them “Israeli plants”.
I appreciate the confirmation that the comment is promoting misinformation.
I’m leaving it with the note that I can prove it’s at least PARTIALLY correct. The statement is overblown, and Fatah may be just as disliked, I just don’t see a source as definitive as the bit about the PA.
This is… An odd standard. So am I to understand that if part of a comment is deemed partially correct (and accompanied by verifiable misinformation) this is not removed? Seems like a lack of enforcement to me, and that the comment should be corrected at the very least. But if this is traditionally how things are done here, then I suppose this is what I should expect moving forward.
Personally, this seems like a less than sneaky way to avoid the rules of the sub.