• Gladaed@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is misleading: Habitat destruction, e.g. Lack of thorny hedges and maize monoculture decimated wild animal population.

  • takeheart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The source for the bird loss is: Loss et al. Love it when people have fitting names like that. A painter named Brush, an investment banker named Rich, a hairdresser named Mane, etc.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What about the loss of habitat, anyone who knows even a little bit about birds, at least in the western hemisphere, know that thousands of species only mate in certain areas in certain times of years. The loss of habitats for mating, the loss of food sources in the remaining habitats from pesticides, and the fact that many pesticides and other pollutants LITERALLY DEGRADE BIRD SHELLS AND KILL THEM BEFORE THEY HATCH

    House cats shouldn’t be putting a fucking dent in bird populations and it’s both absurd to think they’re the real threat and disingenuous to the causes of ill that plague our ecology

    I’m not shitting on you, OP, but in definitely shitting on the person who made this infographic and I’m shitting on the people who continue to push the myth that cats are the leading cause of loss in bird populations. They may kill many birds, but they’re not the reason we’re losing them. Not at all by far.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cat’s shouldn’t be putting a dent in the bird population because they shouldn’t be outside. They’re an invasive species that can definitely destroy local ecosystems.

      Yes habitat destruction is reducing bird population, but that doesn’t excuse the irresponsibility of cat owners that let their cats outside. All that accomplished is creating two problems.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t understand why people are so defensive about this. Study after study shows that cats are fucking terrible for native ecosystems.

        Not just that, outdoor cats live much shorter lives. There is literally no reason to put a cat outside unless you hate your pet and your ecosystem.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s irresponsible and stupid, but my sweet baby would never!

          Or it’s not fair to keep them inside all day! Okay build an enclosure outside they can go into like a responsible owner.

          I don’t even know what all to say to the chucklefuck that thinks it’s fine that the Scottish Wildcat is being bred to extinction. It’s okay though because that’s just evolution.

          Humanity was a fucking mistake

          • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I didn’t say it’s fine. I said it’s the only problem when you made the grand claim that domestic cats were basically stealing their food source.

            Because you made it sound like they’re dying, when they’re really just hybridising. Both are forms of extinction in a sense, but one is a lot worse than the other.

            And again, they don’t even live in the same damn parts of the country.

            Americans like you need put in your place and reminded that the whole world does not revolve about you and your country’s circumstances.

            • Montagge@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes only in America are wild cats threatening native cat’s food sources. At least you’re able to see America from your pedestal.

              • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You told me, that the domestic cat must be eating the Scottish Wildcat’s lunch.

                We were specifically talking about that species at that point. Don’t try to spin it.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Except plastic straws don’t really do anything to accelerate climate change and cats can decimate bird populations

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Except plastic straws aren’t actively hunting marine creatures.

          Domesticated cats are not native to north america and western Europe, and people should be more responsible in how they care for their pets, especially the ones that are invasive fucking species.

          Also, 2 things can be true. It’s possible that bird populations are being decimated by ecological destruction as well as the mass breeding and free roaming of invasive predators introduced by humans.

          Edit: clarified that I meant domesticated cats

          • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            “Cats are not native to north america and western Europe”

            You’re just wrong, at least about the Europe part. There’s literally a species known as the Scottish Wildcat. And last I checked, Scotland was in western Europe.

            Can Americans stop spreading patently false information based on their Amero-centric worldview? Please and thank you.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Fantastically, a wild cat isn’t a domestic cat! Wow! Who knew!

              Stop thinking that things that make you feel bad about your world view are “patently false information based on an amero-centric worldview”. Please and fucking thank you

              • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Facts and sources, better downvote because that doesn’t match my vibes about my outdoor cats lmfao

              • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You edited your comment, so don’t get snarky about me not accounting for an edit you made after I replied.

                Anyways,

                I mentioned wildcats because they are similar to domestic cats and the existence of them here disprove the “it’s not their natural habitat” talking point.

                The Scottish Wildcat is so overwhelmingly similar to the domestic cat that they can interbreed.

                And this fact might entertain you: both types of wildcat mentioned are considered Felis Silvestris. They’re really not that different.

                I don’t care about some American publication talking about cats as that is obviously going to be specific to America, and it’s claims of invasiveness do not apply to many other places, or are such a small concern it’s not considered.

                Here’s a UK source, a bit more applicable to where I live:

                http://web.archive.org/web/20200206053916/www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/advice/gardening-for-wildlife/animal-deterrents/cats-and-garden-birds/are-cats-causing-bird-declines/

                That’s the checks notes Royal Society for the Protection of Birds noting that cats are not causing issues for bird populations. Give it a read.

                • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I edited one word of my comment because I had another reply from someone who misunderstood what I was referring to, so i clarified so there wouldnt be further confusion, not to give myself an excuse to be snarky.

                  • I’ve read the article you’ve provided a number of times previously and while yes, it does indicate that there is no scientific evidence for my claim, it is limited to the UK.

                  • I don’t see what interbreed-ability has to do with invasiveness?

                  I don’t care about some American publication talking about cats

                  • I provided 3 sources, one was American, the others were from Oxford (also in the UK last I checked) and Tillburg (Netherlands), both discussing the EU broadly

                  • Here is another study from the checks notes British Ecological Society which concludes in part

                  “…It is also well established that free-ranging cats pose a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and restoration worldwide, and that remedying this threat is relatively easy when compared to other drivers of biodiversity loss…”

                  If you’re not going to read the evidence I’m providing, while saying I’m only providing americentric evidence, then I’m going to respectfully abandon this thread. I apologize for the snark, that was uncalled for.

                  Edit: formatting only

          • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Wild Cats Of North America:

            Bobcat

            Canada Lynx

            Puma / Mountain Lion / Cougar

            Ocelot

            Jaguarundi

            Jaguar

            Margay

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I was specifically referring to domesticated cats not being native to these regions since that was what is being discussed.

              • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’d argue a housecat and a bobcat share a similar ecological niche. Haven’t the housecats simply replaced the bobcats that were largely removed by humans?

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I find it weird that Americans never let their cats outside. I mean, they’re outside animals.

        Would you stay indoors forever? No?

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You don’t let your cats out for the same reason zoos don’t let their bears out into your fucking neighborhood ya goddamn dingus. They don’t belong there and can do serious damage to the local fauna.

          also outdoor cats live an average of 3-5 years.

          Indoor cats live can for 15-20+.

          So sure, if you are pro-premature cat death. Let your pet cat outside.

          • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They don’t belong there

            They don’t cause serious ecological harm. Even the fucking bird preservation or whatever body says cats don’t have a serious impact on local bird populations.

            Oh and they do belong outside, actually. They come in and go out as they please.

            Outdoor cats live an average of 3-5 years

            Most cats are outdoor here, and live a damn sight longer than that. My own cat is 7 and counting. I have a relative who had an 18 year old cat.

            Maybe lifespan is different here because we don’t have 10-lane motorways every 10 meters in every direction.

            And for the record, if possible it is better for bears to be, well, outdoors in their natural habitat rather than a zoo.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because we’re more responsible at this one thing apparently. They’re invasive. You want to let them outside take them to their native habitat.

          • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            There are literally wild cats you can find, especially here.

            This pretty much is their natural habitat. 🙂

            But yeah tell me again how we’re all irresponsible for letting our cats breathe fresh air because they’re “iNvAsIvE”.

            • Montagge@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              So you release your cat in the wild to kill the food source for native cats?

              • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Talking about my own country specifically here:

                They’re not really in competition. They’re mainly concentrated in the pretty much unpopulated highlands, whereas domestic cats owned by humans are mainly concentrated in the central belt.

                Scottish Wildcats are endangered technically, but not in terms of competition from domestic cats killing them or taking their food. Rather, they’re interbreeding (because they’re so similar!). That’s just evolution at the end of the day.

                Even though they’re still considered endangered because “pure” wildcats population is reducing, the wildcats are still living and creating offspring, some of which are still wild cats, even if they’re not purebred “wildcat”.

                • Montagge@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So irresponsible cat owners let their cats outside and didn’t neuter or spay them. Cool beans.

                  It’s just evolution lol

      • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That doesn’t un-kill the animals that died from deforestation, and repopulation can take years or decades.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Barely moves the needle. Birds are extremely adaptable and readily find habitats in rural, exurban, suburban, and even urban environments. Letting a housecat outside is one of the worst things that a single individual can do for the environment.

      • TwoCubed@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        This may be true for the USA. In Germany the biggest killer is agriculture, followed by buildings, then cars and then come the cats. I’m guessing this is the reason for the controversy regarding this topic. Cats aren’t that big a problem in Germany. Especially if you have a programmable cat flap that leaves the cats inside during morning and evening times. During daytime they don’t catch shit.

      • smcool@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        So destroying over 90% of their natural Habitat is not worse than a single predator? Nevermind most other predators that have been driven to extinction anyway

    • WhippetBowie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have. Random outdoor cat walked over to me, demanded pets, it noticed a bird, killed the bird, and came back to me looking for more attention. I was not impressed.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I have feed around 10 stray cats for the last 15 years. Only one of them was a hunter, and by that, I mean it’s like watching captain Levi dealing with giants. I once saw her take down two pigeons at the same time.

  • MoonJellyfish@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s why I say people should not own cats! Or big dogs (they are just dangerous). Buy some small breed dog or adopt one and be happy.