• Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    The image in the article shows the entire thing being 20cm and the actual ‘blade’ portion of the toy being around 13cm long. a little longer than the blade on a pretty standard multi tool like a Leatherman.

    Is this seriously what the police were actually concerned about, I understand that it’s different in the UK vs the US, but this is definitely overkill. This thing would need to be pinched between your thumb and index finger like a cigarette to be wielded and is arguably less dangerous than a fork.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’re only allowed to have 7.62 cm, so from a legal standpoint it’s almost twice the legal limit.

      If the law doesn’t make sense you don’t challenge it by breaking it.

      The police don’t carry guns there so yeah they’re concerned.

      Running around twirling a clearly illegal item in public is pretty good logical grounds for police intervention. If the law says 3 in when do you actually stop them is it 4, 10, 12? If he was just transporting it from one house to another they might have let it go. But he’s walking around fidgeting twirling it in the open. I suspect he was performing twirls and dagger tricks. So the general public is probably also a little concerned. If he’s walking around his neighborhood twirling it around all the time it might even been a neighbor that called the police on it.

      The fine is reasonable, getting locked up for 4 months is probably a bit much.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          How else can one react to a person defending a violent criminal? Maybe you should remove such comments instead.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            First, a guy carrying a toy sword is not “a violent criminal”.

            Second, even if they were, defending them doesn’t break any of the community rules.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              First of all, it’s not a toy sword according to the law. Second, that guy was carrying it unsheathed. Third, he didn’t have a good reason to carry. But fourth, the most important thing, that guy is a known criminal who already served four years for burglary. He broke not a “community rule”, he broke multiple laws and is a known offender.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                We aren’t talking about what the guy did, we’re talking about you wanting to remove another users comment for imaginary reasoning.

                Nothing in the comment broke the rules, that comment stands.

                The reply to it broke the civility rules, it was removed.