The ban is in effect through Bastille Day in order to prevent “serious disturbances” to public order, the French government announced Sunday.

  • guyman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As with most things, take it from the wealthy.

    If it ever seems like there’s not enough to go around, blame those who have too much. We could solve these problems, but not while protecting the profits of the ruling class.

    • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As with most things, take it from the wealthy.

      I disagree that all of our problems can be solved by taking other peoples wealth and the government allocating it as they deem fit.

      If it ever seems like there’s not enough to go around, blame those who have too much

      Why? If my neighbor hunts deer and gets 10 deer this winter, and I hunt and get 0, how is it his fault?

      We could solve these problems, but not while protecting the profits of the ruling class.

      We could solve these problems but we gave 10 trillion dollars into a black pit of war and the military industrial complex over the last 2 decades.

      We could solve these problems but the government has a budget with 50% going towards social programs that are economically unsustainable.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If your neighbour, having been born in an extremelly wealthy family, hired 100 hunters and hunted all deers in a 100 mile radius and offered to sell you venison, and you subsequently went hunting, got 0 and had to buy the venison from him, that would absolutelly be his fault.

        As it so happens my version of the metaphor is very much how it works nowadays at that level of wealth compared to the normal individual.

        It’s funny that in your mind they work just like you, even down to doing it hands on: that’s not even close to how it happens with the vast majority of them and even the ones who do “work” used their wealth as a force multiplier to make way more happen than you could ever possibly do and thus get way more benefits than you could possible get (normallly make way more money which they can use as an even bigger force muliplier in the next round).

        Thanks to the force-multiplying effect of money the actions of the rich absolutely have the power (quite often purposefully abused, like in my hunting metaphor) to distort the conditions within which everybody else “hunts” and make sure everybody else has to go through them to get what they need.

        Nobody would have any problem with the rich if their taking wasn’t so vast that it stops everybody else from getting even a little bit.

        • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If your neighbour, having been born in an extremelly wealthy family, hired 100 hunters and hunted all deers in a 100 mile radius and offered to sell you venison, and you subsequently went hunting, got 0 and had to buy the venison from him, that would absolutelly be his fault.

          His fault of what? Hunting more? I don’t own the deer, nor the land the deer are on. In fact, it’d probably work better for me, he doesn’t have use for all the deer, and I can buy it pretty cheap from him without getting my hands dirty. Isn’t that what you do? All your stuff, do you make it? Or buy it from someone who provides it?

          As it so happens my version of the metaphor is very much how it works nowadays at that level of wealth compared to the normal individual.

          Not really. You didn’t explain why it’s my neighbors responsibility to give me food.

          It’s funny that in your mind they work just like you, even down to doing it hands on: that’s not even close to how it happens with the vast majority of them and even the ones who do “work” used their wealth as a force multiplier to make way more happen than you could ever possibly do and thus get way more benefits than you could possible get (normallly make way more money which they can use as an even bigger force muliplier in the next round).

          Yeah. Once you have your needs met and have expendable income you can use that how you see fit. Some use it for luxuries, some use it to make more money.

          I’m not gonna be mad at how someone uses their property. That doesn’t do anybody any good.

          Nobody would have any problem with the rich if their taking wasn’t so vast that it stops everybody else from getting even a little bit.

          Yes, you and many other young left wing folks would. It stems from jealousy, not necessity. The world is a much much much better place due to capitalism, which has brought insane amounts of people out of poverty, into positions they don’t have to worry about starving everyday.

          You’re just mad because your wealth hasn’t increased as much as theirs. Your life is easier than 90% of people throughout world history, your on your little Mac or Iphone, in your air conditioned home because it’s a little too hot this july, drinking your starbucks coffee, stewing in hatred about how rich people are awful, but anybody in human history will look at your life of luxury and be appalled how someone with so much comfort and wealth is complaining.