so that means they dont need to murder innocents anymore right??
Wrong. They want to eliminate the very last Hamas fighter while totally ignoring the Hydra effect.
Killed about a dozen children to get him though /s
Killed several thousand
about a dozenchildren to get him thoughhttps://www.dci-palestine.org/3_760_palestinian_children_killed_twice_as_many_injured_in_gaza
Excuse me, I believe the term used was “human animals”, so they would be “human animal young”, not children.
/s, also fuck this world
What is a water bomb? (From the video)
Removed by mod
How many innocent children needed to die for this achievement?
To all the commentators that obviously know better how to act in a war:
How should Israel act to defend its citizens from the ongoing attacks? How should Israel act, so that Hamas will never be able to harm civilians again?
And don’t tell us what you DON‘T want, tell us what you DO want.
This is the fallacy that America had with black gangs. They think gangs are the problem and the problem needs to be removed.
The reality is that gangs are a solution to problems, such as wealth inequality, racism, violence.
The solution to Hamas is to remove the conditions that made them necessary, which are apartheid, violence, forcible eviction, wealth inequality.
However, Israel’s goals are the ethnic cleansing of the area, so this will never work for them. Talks of peace a tool of distraction. If this is not true, then they will return to the 1948 borders, which would make a viable Palestinian and Israeli state. But they’ll, make bullshit excuses of why that’s not possible.
This is the fallacy that America had with black gangs. They think gangs are the problem and the problem needs to be removed.
The reality is that gangs are a solution to problems, such as wealth inequality, racism, violence.
The solution to Hamas is to remove the conditions that made them necessary, which are apartheid, violence, forcible eviction, wealth inequality.
So you are saying the Islamic State / IS / Daesh was also the product of „conditions that made them necessary“?
However, Israel’s goals are the ethnic cleansing of the area, so this will never work for them. Talks of peace a tool of distraction. If this is not true, then they will return to the 1948 borders, which would make a viable Palestinian and Israeli state. But they’ll, make bullshit excuses of why that’s not possible.
Do you know that the Palestinian authorities have denied EVERY attempt of a two state solution since 1948? Why would „they“ now accept borders, they have categorically denied before?
Do you know that the Palestinian authorities have denied EVERY attempt of a two state solution since 1948? Why would „they“ now accept borders, they have categorically denied before?
Did they? Or is it Netanyahu? Palestinian Authority had repeatedly demand for the 1948 border to be respected, and evict all the violent illegal settler from the west bank, and Israel repeatedly refused.
So you want to pretend this is about the creation of a two state solution?
https://news.yahoo.com/hamas-member-says-repeat-attacks-065643206.html
You either talk about Hamas, or you talk about Palestinian Authority, both are different entity and you’re just disingenuous for thinking they’re the same and you should feel bad.
“they have denied every attempt at two state solution”
Usual Israeli propaganda to continue the victimhood facade. Israel takes a shit on what a two-state solution should look like, of course the Arabs will bloody reject it.
Yeah, you should probably hear it from Hamas directly, what they think about peace:
https://news.yahoo.com/hamas-member-says-repeat-attacks-065643206.html
By being defensive, not by killing children rofl
They should have thought about this when they literally picked this place for their state and other people had already claimed that land fairly.
Israel got this land assigned from Great Britain after the 2nd world war who at the time had the right to it after the Ottoman Empire was destroyed.
Also Jewish people were living there for thousands of years before.they were kicked out illegitimately.
Who has the “right” to this country depends how far you go back and that argument is not helping at all in the current conflict.
Or would you say that American people should just 'endure the rockets" if the ancestors from native americans started bombing New York?
Even if what happened at the time was unjust it doesn’t give the other party a free reign to do whatever they want
Got assigned this land.??? People were living there already. England just kicked them out. That’s somehow ok with you.
