Israeli official says Hamas doesn’t want to release remaining women because it doesn’t want them speaking publicly about what they endured on Oct. 7 and in their time in captivity

The temporary truce between Israel and Hamas broke down this week after the Palestinian terror group that rules Gaza refused to release 10 more female hostages, and instead sought to free abductees taken on October 7 from other categories, in violation of the agreement, Israeli officials said Friday.

The terms of the deal, brokered by Qatar, specified that Hamas would first release all women and children being held in Gaza and Israel would agree to a pause in fighting for up to 10 days, the Walla news site reported Friday, citing three Israeli officials.

Ahead of the eighth day of the truce, Hamas failed to propose a list of hostages set for release that would be acceptable to Israel in the final hours, as stipulated in the deal, and instead sent a message through Qatari and Egyptian mediators that it was prepared to release male hostages. Hamas had also proposed to release bodies of hostages it said were killed during captivity.

    • Stamau123@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      10 months ago

      I guess the rockets in the air and the hostages not produced are all just holograms and magician disappearing acts?

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ever notice that during any of these “hostage” exchanges, Israel always has a ready supply of Palestinian “prisoners” to exchange in return? Funny how it’s only one side taking “hostages”.

        • chowder@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s almost like one side is arresting specific people with handcuffs and eventually pressing actual charges instead of sending in a giant group of people to abduct as many people as possible.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s almost like one side is arresting specific people with handcuffs

            We call that an apartheid state. Framing laws to specifically target an ethnic group so you can expell and eradicate them. In the US we called them Jim Crow laws.

            • Occamsrazer@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              10 months ago

              In the US when you kill random people it’s murder and when you take random people who aren’t breaking any laws and child them captive, then it’s kidnapping.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            What are you on about?

            One side has snatched up thousands from Israel, Gaza, West Bank and held them without trial.

            • chowder@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              10 months ago
              1. You can’t read. 2. Still not even close to the same thing.
              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh well you tell that to the innocent people being abducted.

                • chowder@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Again, arrested not abducted. They are going to an actual prison with actual charges applied eventually. Whether or not those charges are warranted is up for debate.

                  • Quokka@quokk.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    No.

                    Many of them never get charged, they just get taken and if they’re lucky a month or so later they’re dumped somewhere random.

          • febra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Alright, that is simply not true. Most of these people are held in “administrative detention” indifinetely and don’t even get to see a judge. When they get to see a judge, they end up in a military court for offences as simple as throwing rocks, and the punishments are disproportionately harsh. The conviction rate of these courts was at around 99.7% a few years ago. Don’t just take it from me, take it from Breaking the silence, an israeli NGO comprised of ex IDF soldiers that served in the occupied territories and are now speaking out.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not surprising at all considering how both Hamas and PA are heavily focused on indoctrinating citizens to hate Jews and commit terror acts.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m saying taking one side of a conflict’s statements at face value, especially Israel’s, is incredibly naive or willfully ignorant.

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Saying Israel is biased and untrustworthy isn’t taking a side unless you think Israel can’t be criticized. In which case, I don’t care what you have to say.