• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    294
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is your hourly reminder that Brave is still Chromium and still contributes to Google’s influence over internet standards.

    • amnesiacrobat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      165
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Iirc Firefox and I think Safari are the only major non-chromium browsers. It makes me so sad because I remember Google’s “don’t be evil” days… man they left that behind

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        Safari already has attestation, has for a while, so while its at least a different browser, it’s still part of the problem.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier.

              • SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot.

                Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me.

                • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I feel like you’re referring to Firefox literally 12 years ago or more. I’m talking about today. Literally any brand new standard is not supported for 1-2 years minimum. I run into problems with safari on a near daily basis. I rarely have a weird issue in Firefox. 99% of the time chrome and Firefox behave the same. The vast majority of the time that one browser has an issue others don’t, it’s safari. It’s weird to me to get pushback on this …

                  • SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Backdrop filters were introduced with Firefox 103, which was released just 12 months ago. And it was a major pain for me that Firefox was the only browser I had to do workarounds for this function when Safari supported it since 2015 and chrome did since 2019.

                    Every platform has some problems. But it’s fairly rare for me to run into these nowadays. I still love using Firefox. But just because your experience is different than mine doesn’t mean that mine is outdated. It’s not meant to be a pushback against your comment, just sharing that there had been issues with Firefox in the past as well.

      • TheAlbacor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for pointing this out! I was already using Firefox, but after looking this up I found out that they also got rid of him for being homophobic.

        Firefox it is!

      • Fest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        i always use software for what it is, ignoring the beliefs of its creator, but ive already been using firefox, librewolf and mullvad browser since i moved to linux, and i have only been seeing people say stuff that shows chromium is worse. (except for people with no argument of course)

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Librewolf has been pretty cool since I started using it as a sidearm with less than 600 ff tabs, how does mullvad compare?

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Librewolf has been pretty cool since I started using it as a sidearm with less than 600 ff tabs, how does mullvad compare?

    • Hobbes@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The CEO also donated to Prop 8 in California and a number of other bigoted conservative things.

    • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is your hourly reminder that default Firefox isn’t that great for privacy thus librewolf exist

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool. If me choosing Brave over FF contributes to the demise of the useless, cash-grab scam which Mozilla is, I’ll happily continue using Brave.