• Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      they don’t know to make a good android app, and you want them to make an entire cellphone💀💀

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They made an entire Linux-powered portable game system that’s revolutionizing Linux gaming at the moment…an embedded engineer is not the same skillset as an app developer. Not even close.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          They made a device with a proprietary operating system and proprietary software. If you really want that, why not just use Android?

            • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Steam OS is proprietary.

              But Arch contains proprietary firmware, so technically it’s not fully free software either.

              • Titou@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                SteamOS is open source with some closed sources component. But most important think you seems not being able to understand is that Valve provide high support to Open source community, which means it wouldn’t be surprising if they decided to drop a open source phone.

                • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  SteamOS is open source with some closed sources component.

                  So it is not free software. It’s proprietary, unethical software that takes away your freedom. Just like Windows, Android, etc.

                  But most important think you seems not being able to understand is that Valve provide high support to Open source community, which means it wouldn’t be surprising if they decided to drop a open source phone.

                  By doing what? They only want to lock you in their proprietary platform. Most of heir software is proprietary, their games are proprietary and they restrict users with DRM. It’s a terrible company, which abuses their users. If Steam Deck contains proprietary software, why would their phone by anything different?

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hell, I think even Raspberry Pi Foundation getting into the phone market would be a game changer too.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        9 months ago

        A lot of the libcamera work done on Raspberry Pi boards is going towards improving the camera support on linux phones like the PinePhone, which is great!

        Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations, and are preparing to go public despite being a “charity”. Broadcom, their SoC supplier, also has left a sour taste in my mouth after their purchase and mass layoffs at VMWare.

        If they created a phone it would likely end up being scalped to death, and maybe pretty pricey compared to a PinePhone

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations

          Just out of curiosity, could you state what you think their mission was?

          (I’m just wondering if anybody even remembers their original original mission.)

          • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            AFAIK their original mission was along the lines of making computers accessible at a low price point, particularly targeting the education sector in parts of the world where computers weren’t very accessible or affordable. Comparable to the OLPC, but not on an individual basis

            I could be wrong though

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s basically it. Here’s the thing: if they followed through on that to the letter, most of the people complaining wouldn’t have ever gotten one.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Don’t forget that Raspberry PI can’t run a mainline Linux kernel. You can’t install an official Debian build on it for example. I don’t get why people are ok with that.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If they did that, it would be sold out for years before you or I could get it.

        • Teppic@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They seem to have resolved their supply chain issues for now. I could buy a Pi 5 and have it dispatched tomorrow, and I did buy a Pi 4b recently, no issues with delays or lead times.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think you could go fast enough to catch Valve as they ran screaming from that idea.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe it’d be the first “specialty” phone with decent specs. I always get excited for these “specialty” type phones like “Linux on my PHONE? Fuck yea!”

      Until I look at the specs and it’s crap every single time and then I’m just disappointed, like the PinePhone Pro has just 4GB LPDDR4 (No not even the good LPDDR4x) lmao like what is this, 2015?? Lolol

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Everything that matters is open source and upstreamed or on the way there. Haven’t kept up with the state of things but as far as I am aware you can already run a mainline kernel on the Deck. Would love to see an open phone you can easily run your own distribution on without jumping through hoops.

        But phones are hard. An x86 phone with decent battery life is even harder. But one can dream.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s certainly great that you can install any distro with mainline kernel on the deck (even if some things don’t work). But my point was that Valve doesn’t care about user freedom. Their OS and the Steam client are proprietary. If they made a GNU/Linux phone, there is no guarantee that you would be able to install a free distro and it almost certainly would come with non free software by default, which would be bad.

          Would love to see an open phone you can easily run your own distribution on without jumping through hoops.

          I think PinePhone Pro and Librem 5 can run a mainline kernel. It’s possible that some things won’t work, but a lot of stuff has been upstreamed. I’m curious if you can easily install an ARM build of Debian on them, but couldn’t find any information last time I looked it up.

          But phones are hard. An x86 phone with decent battery life is even harder. But one can dream.

          Oh yeah, that is the dream. I wonder how are the current mobile Ryzen CPUs. I’m curious if there is any that could work well in a phone.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is a Debian spin for the Pinephone called Mobian. I ran that for quite a while with Phosh as the front end. It’s probably still installed on the device.

            What I hate about ARM is that you basically need a separate image for every device instead of one for everything like with x86.

            • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I use Mobian with Phosh too! What I love about Mobian is that it’s just a small overlay on top of Debian. The project’s goal is literally to upstream everything into Debian and to stop existing. You can see that it doesn’t add a lot of packages: https://packages.mobian.org

              Yeah, you are right about ARM. It seems to be true about RISC-V as well. It’s so weird that so many people think those kinds of devices will be good for us. Sometimes I watch reviews of single board computers on YouTube and the reviewers never mention that the device can’t run mainline Linux. They can’t install Debian from debian.org on them. So instead they install some distro provided by the manufacturer and for some reason they are just fine with that. Raspberry PI is the same and almost nobody seems to be talking about this. So that’s why I’m not sure if you can install a normal distro on PinePhone Pro or Librem 5, even though they can run mainline Linux.

              Also ARM SoC manufacturers don’t seem to try to have upstream Linux support. So I think that’s why PinePhone uses a 2010 SoC (if I remember correctly) and Pro uses a 2016 SoC. It’s a bad platform.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Linux phones will need to run established Android apps to get users, devs won’t move where there is no users, users won’t move there if there aren’t apps. It’s almost cyclical

    Right now we’re working with people who are exceptions to this, users who want to experiment and devs who don’t care about money.

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Waydroid runs decently on the pinephone. On a phone with better specs, it might be downright usable for proprietary apps.

      Potentially a proton-style layer could really ease transition, like on the steamdeck

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        BlackBerry 10 was actually a pretty slick OS that supported Android apps and you could even side-load Google Play services.

        • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Then you run far, far away from that app. Even on an Android phone I don’t trust garbage apps that require locked bootloader and no root. There are plenty of banks out there and paying with your phone is not a necessity.

          • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hey, do you still plan on working on your RGB mod for PinePhone’s keyboard? It looked really awesome, but it’s probably a huge amount of work.

            • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              I went through probably 20 different iterations of keycaps and got close to one I liked, but haven’t gotten back to finishing the project since I haven’t been using my PinePhone much. I think the main remaining thing is to make an Enter key model and a Tab key model. I want to get back to that project eventually but haven’t had time.

              • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Wow, that sounds complicated. But I’m curious if your keycaps would work better for typing than the default ones.

                • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Not really, it’s been a hassle to get them consistent enough to match the default ones. The small scale makes printing them difficult even after I got a resin printer for the project. I settled on a two piece design that works pretty well but the resin material is not as smooth as the injection molded stock caps.

        • bisby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          LineageOS doesn’t support Play Integrity either. Custom ROMs seem to be doing just fine.

          There’s the stories about “I have to have Windows because the school’s exam proctor software requires Windows and doesn’t work with Linux” but ultimately that’s not the thing that stops the year of the linux desktop. And banking apps won’t be what breaks the year of the linux phone.

        • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Thats a fair point, i never tried banking on waydroid. Most of the stuff i would need on the go seemed fine though.

          Although, as far as tap to pay goes, i could see that getting baked into linux properly. I dont believe apple pay and google pay tap pay are using a different protocol. I may very well be wrong though.

          • cyruseuros@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s not about the protocols. It’s about business. We can have all the tech we want but until someone is willing to establish relationships with and pay the 3-4 middlemen involved in every single card payment it ain’t happening.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Potentially a proton-style layer could really ease transition, like on the steamdeck

        But if people still use proprietary software, then what’s the point? Steam OS is a proprietary operating system. Is that really what we want?

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Progressive Web Apps. Web programs broke the need for Microsoft Windows.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        We have Waydroid which is close enough. It needs some quality of life improvements for better integration with the native Linux ecosystem but it runs Android apps just fine on Linux phones.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed. Classic story that has been repeated several times over the years. Ecosystem is everything.

      Microsoft’s Windows phones were fantastic. They had super nice hardware, high refresh rate screens, better cameras on their flagship models than iPhones at the time.

      They were sleek, fast, the Windows tile UI actually worked great on a phone touchscreen. But it didn’t matter to most consumers because they didn’t have apps. MS had their own business apps…and that was about it. Didn’t matter that every other aspect of the phones were great, people couldn’t do what they wanted to on the Windows phones, so they didn’t buy them.

      I would love to see something like Proton but for .apks instead of Windows executables. If it were as easy to install and run android apps on a mobile Linux OS as it is now to install and play Windows games on Linux, we would be in a great place to see a proper Linux phone.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        GNU/Linux is not aimed at people who want the most features. It’s made for people who value freedom above everything else.

        I would love to see something like Proton but for .apks instead of Windows executables. If it were as easy to install and run android apps on a mobile Linux OS as it is now to install and play Windows games on Linux, we would be in a great place to see a proper Linux phone.

        You mean Waydroid? I’ve read that it works pretty well.

    • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Absolutely yes! I think this is what killed the reasonably good Windows Phones. I liked them anyway. They did what phones were supposed to do and were dirt cheap. But if you searched for any of the top 50 apps you’d find some fake BS. Like when I searched for Pandora you got an app that was nothing more than a 3-4 page summary about how Pandora was the planet in James Cameron’s Avatar.

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The goal of GNU/Linux is not to make it possible to run proprietary apps (but if you really need to run Android apps you can use Waydroid). It’s to create a fully libre operating system that people can use.

    • dan@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The hell with android apps. In my last year with Droidian, I got better replacements for any single app I used on Android!

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      hot take: No.

      Linux phones just need good linux software support. And then the linux user base will switch over, and everyone who isn’t simply won’t use it.

      I actually genuinely do not want android developers on linux. I refuse to pay for a launcher. My entire workstation OS is developed by volunteers. Genuinely every single android app i have ever interacted with has pretty much exclusively disappointed me. It’s just a bad ecosystem.

      In the same way that the linux community doesn’t need the developers of every application ever on it to thrive amongst itself, the linux phone doesnt need android developers to develop apps for it. It just needs better support for linux applications that already exist.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The only reason I will disagree: there’s already a major FOSS ecosystem on Android. There are tons of high quality free apps that aren’t FOSS

        Linux isnt even that popular on desktop, my point is that people will not move if their pre established software use case is not avaliable. I won’t. I know many people who won’t.

        And if there aren’t users, there won’t be people making quality software to cover wide variety of usecases and get support, if there isn’t quality software that covers a wide variety of use cases and get support there won’t be users. You need to start somewhere, it’s why the windows phone failed. No devs, so no users, and because no users, no devs.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I still don’t see your point. You’re assuming that android users will want to use a linux phone in the first place. They don’t and they wont. And that’s fine.

          The only market that the linux phone has to cater to in order to develop successfully is the existing linux desktop market. The vast majority of those people are likely to want and use a linux phone. Which will actually improve the phone. And possibly even in the future bring in android developers and apps.

          I don’t understand why you’re fixing on it growing, it’s just a hardware market, system76 already exists, pine already exists, linux users already exist. We exist as a bubble in a larger space and that’s ok. That’s the beauty of the unix/linux philosophy.

          Realistically this is like releasing a 10,000 dollar workstation/server cpu and then having the general public complain about it being inaccessible, even though it literally wasn’t meant for them.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m sure there’s a lot of good apps. I’ve used a few good ones, but it’s objectively worse than software on linux.

          File browsers have almost universally just been awful. Horrid, and almost completely unusable. I’ve tried more than should exist really.

          There are other questionable apps, which exist, do what they claim to do perfectly well, but have no utility for anything particularly useful. Even stuff like jerboa is just generally lacking in features. That is also an experience on linux so not really a huge complaint, but i really genuinely don’t see why people like android so much.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I appreciate the people who daily drive pinephones. They are paving the way for when they’ll be viable alternatives for the masses. (Or verifying that they won’t be, we’ll see.)

  • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everyone saying Android is completely missing the point. I mean yeah, it runs the linux kernel, but i feel like most of yall wouldn’t call ChromeOS linux on the other hand.

    The obvious connotations are privacy, choice, wayland/x11 support, a useful terminal, a rich foss ecosystem, and arch btw.

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      ChromeOS is Linux and even starting to become it’s own full blown distro.
      ChromeOS even uses Wayland now.
      Lacros

    • genie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d agree with you in the context of standard (google) android.

      One caveat that I’d like to highlight, though, is that for me GrapheneOS and F-Droid handily achieve the privacy and rich FOSS ecosystem parts. Useful terminal depends on your definition :) but for my use case Termux fills the void.

      It doesn’t feel like Linux (you can’t even use Wifi and Ethernet at the same time for crying out loud) but for a relatively cheap low-power device, I like the flexibility.

      It’s far enough from being a foot gun that I can give a Pixel 5 with GrapheneOS and some F-Droid apps to my grandmother and know she’ll have no problems. Balancing that with having enough extensibility to scratch the itch for 99% of tinkerers is a feat to appreciate in my view.

      • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        My point is really just that it is an entirely different software stack than the traditional linux experience. I cant just download the source for a standard linux app and compile it for android, it needs to be ported.

        I think pinephone and librem are the closest we have gotten to a proper linux phone. But the specs suck, and the mobile optimized app ecosystem isnt there yet. Thats the point of the op meme.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I can confirm that my PinePhone runs the same software that I run on my desktop. I usually don’t even need to compile anything, since a lot of packages in Debian repo have an ARM version. Not all apps have responsive UIs and some of the old ones lack touch support, though. But that is something that keeps improving over time (GNOME 4 and libhandy for example). You can also use CLI programs if you want.

    • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would call anything running the Linux kernel “Linux”. Granted my LineageOS phone isn’t very much like my Debian PC, but they’re both Linux.

  • frathiemann@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Daily drivin Manjaro (Plasma mobile) on my Pinephone Pro for over a year now. If you are not into the whole “taking pictures all the time” thing you can easiy use it as a daily driver. (This message was typed on it)

  • nodsocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Android is already a Linux phone” They hated Jesus because he told them the truth.

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      My favorite phone by far. Absolutely loved combined messenger built into OS and that GUI is still unmatched by any OS as far as I’m concerned.

    • ghterve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have fond memories of using my N900. But I would not have described it as well working :) It worked, sure, but not particularly well.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It definitely worked better than a Pinephone. And even with its puny RAM it was better at multitasking than a modern Android phone.

  • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay look I get what we’re trying to say here but would it be problematic if I pointed out that Android is also running Linux?

    • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a valid point, but unfortunately your non bullshit options are limited to replacing the OS with something like Graphene or Lineage.

      The powers that be REALLY want your data.

      • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I thought you could just use the Android open source project? I thought the tracking was mostly baked into Google’s flavor of Android not the open source product

        • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t know if a phone that uses the open source version as base. Usually they build off open source or google and add in all the manufacturer/carrier bloat. For me to get off One Plus’s built in OS I had to go through this whole process on their website to get the code to unlock the boot loader.

          I have lineage os as a replacement and it’s really cool. My mobile internet stopped working on it though :( my next phone is gonna roll with Graphene

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And lo, the Apocrypha were born, for they spoke the truth that no man dare admitt, lest they be marked an apostate.

      • Ignotum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I use GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux btw

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Same, on desktop and mobile. I don’t know if it’s funny or sad that a community called “linuxmemes” can’t tell the difference between Linux, GNU/Linux and Android.

      • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I mean not technically… those products use a separent kernel that has its own development path away from the Linux kernel. Linux is just a compatible Unix kernel but I wouldn’t classify it as a Unix operating system since it diverges into its own thing. Android still uses the Linux kernel not some piece of code that they developed and not some commercial Unix product

      • legion02@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not if they don’t share any heritage with Unix. Osx is the only one that fits the bill there.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It also counts in the other way: Apple licensed the UNIX™ trademark.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU’s Not Unix!”,[6][12] chosen because GNU’s design is Unix-like, but differs from Unix by being free software and containing no Unix code.[6][13][14] Stallman chose the name by using various plays on words, including the song The Gnu.[4]: 45:30

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      See, this is why, yet again, Stallman was right: insisting on “GNU/Linux” is necessary in order to disambiguate between the fully-Free Software OS and bastardized half-proprietary stuff like Android.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly. Even in this community and in this post people keep mixing Linux, GNU/Linux and Android. It’s crazy that even people who use this operating system are confused. Almost always when they say Linux they really mean GNU/Linux. Linux Mint or Arch Linux are GNU/Linux. But Android isn’t and it doesn’t even use the mainline Linux kernel.

        The issue of freedom is a separate thing, because even most GNU/Linux distros contain proprietary software just like Android.

    • Xanaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I guess most ppl who are supporting the gnu/linux phone are the ones who want a similar apple like features like how the prism os had promised to provide.

    • Shatur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think when people say “Linux phone” they mean GNU/Linux.

        • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          No? PMOS isn’t the only thing people refer to by “Linux phone”, often its something like Ubuntu touch, which absolutely is GNU.

          • TheyCallMeHacked@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fair but Ubuntu Touch is not mainline Linux. It’s a hack to get a GNU/systemd Userland working with an Android kernel (which arguably is also a huge feat)

          • TheyCallMeHacked@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure, but PMOS is by far the most complete and “daily-ready” mobile mainline Linux distro out there. In fact I’m pretty sure both Mobian and MoA use the PMOS kernels…

            • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I haven’t used postmarketOS, but I don’t see why it would be any better than Mobian or Manjaro (Manjaro might not be the most stable though). Maybe you are talking about Android phones, in which case you are probably right - other distros might not support those so well. postmarketOS and other distros don’t use mainline Linux, so I don’t know why you would call them that, though. For me this is the biggest flaw of GNU/Linux phones.

              I know that postmarketOS developers contribute a lot in different areas, but so do Mobian developers. I think the kernel we use was initially developed by Megi.

        • Shatur@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Ah, you probably right, I think it’s more common.

          I personally run ArchLinux on my PinePhone.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        In the US store it costs 200$ for the original PinePhone and 400$ for the Pro version. The EU store is a little more expensive.

        I’m not the person you asked, but I’ve had mine for 2 years.

        Pros:

        • free software and freedom (and with that increased privacy and security)
        • runs the same software that you can run on desktop as long as it has an ARM build (a lot of Debian packages do) or you compile it yourself - this includes not just apps, but also terminal programs and servers
        • killswitch to power off the proprietary modem for when you don’t want phone carrier tracking you
        • like in other modern phones the modem is isolated (here it’s connected over USB)
        • multiple distros to choose from
        • multiple desktop environments to choose from
        • replacable battery
        • headphone jack
        • replacement parts available in case you break something
        • there are some interesting addons that you can buy (https://pine64.org/devices/pinephone/#accessories)
        • microSD card slot
        • you can boot from the microSD card, so distro hopping is easy
        • can run Android apps through Waydroid

        Cons:

        • slow - you are running modern software on an old SoC (the Pro version is faster, but still slow compared to modern phones)
        • not all GNU/Linux apps have a responsive UI that works well on mobile
        • some old apps might not have touch support
        • short battery life - the SoC is not very energy efficient. Possible workarounds: get the keyboard addon with builtin battery (but it makes the phone bigger and heavier), carry spare batteries with you, or buy/3D print a bigger case and use a bigger battery
        • runs hot
        • GPS isn’t super accurate
        • audio quality during phone calls isn’t great
        • the non-pro version might not be able to run a mainline kernel, so you might not be able to install a desktop distro on it
        • the Pro version should be able to run a mainline kernel, but there might be things that don’t work
        • experience with GNU/Linux is required
        • sometimes workarounds are needed - for me, on Mobian stable sometimes the modem or wifi don’t wake up from suspend and I have to reset it with a script (I added it to the apps menu for quick access, but it’s still annoying)
        • [on original PinePhone] bad camera and the default app can only take pictures - there is a script for recording video, but then there is no preview
        • I’m not sure if you can use the camera as a webcam in most software
        • [might depend on the model] video playback is not GPU accelerated, so it makes the CPU hot and drains battery and you might be limited to 1080p@30fps or 720p
        • you can run a stable distro with old software and old bugs (and sometimes things change very fast) or a less stable one with current software, but then things will sometimes break after update and you will have to fix it (probably more than on desktop)
        • on Mobian stable (old software) the proximity sensor acts weird during a call and sometimes you can’t see the screen
        • no Xbox gamepad support in Mobian stable (but Playstation gamepads work)
        • they keyboard addon isn’t perfect and requires some setup
        • with the keyboard addon I can’t plug in any USB devices to the phone and I don’t know why - charging works though
        • support for emergency broadcast is only just now being introduced in Phosh (https://phosh.mobi/posts/cellbroadcast)
        • [original PinePhone] uses micro SIM standard instead of nano SIM
        • sometimes there is screen flickering in non-pro version
        • killswitches could be a bit easier to flip (they are very small)
        • [on original PinePhone] poor 3D performance (even SuperTuxKart doesn’t run smoothly), WebGL doesn’t seem to work (at least for 3D)
        • not a lot of RAM, so you can’t run too many apps at once or have too many browser tabs open - you can still run Electron apps, though (just not too many at once)
        • no push notifications, so if you want to be notified when you get a message in some app, while the phone is suspended, you would have to setup a script to wake the phone up periodically

        Edit: I corrected a mistake with the SIM card. I turns out that PinePhone Pro uses nano SIM and it’s only the original PinePhone that uses micro SIM

      • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Plasma and unity both seem to be the ones I come back to. The other three I would mess with, but something about the other two always brought me back.

          • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            They are all equally capable in my opinion. I really think it’s down to personal preference. I’m not sure if it’s still a thing, but the multiboot SD card images wereVERYhelpful for me.

      • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I used mine on T-Mobile almost daily. It worked okay. Think of early Android days where everyone had their own custom rom and none of them were as smooth as you felt they should be.

          • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I am just assuming, but I believe a data only sim would work.

            There is no e-SIM functionality I am aware of.

            • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah it just means if someone rang the phone would still be routed to my e-sim. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. I am waiting for the right combination of time and energy to add all my chats into matrix bridges on my server. Not having a direct phone to call would almost be ideal… 🤔

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I haven’t used it on the PinePhone or PinePhone Pro in a while, but Waydroid is solid on my OnePlus 6T with postmarketOS. Android apps that only need an Internet connection work fine. I installed microG and have push notifications working for Discord and Teams. However, notifications don’t get passed through to the Linux side so they only show if you open the Android UI. Screen rotation doesn’t work on Waydroid which can be very annoying. Apps that use other hardware features such as location, Bluetooth, vibration, access to calls/texts won’t work properly.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was downvoted before for suggesting the Pinetab is not a viable Android or iPad replacement. That thing doesn’t even have a working wifi driver yet, you have to plug in a dongle just to connect to wifi. I’d love to have good smart devices running Linux one day, but we’re not there yet.

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m quite optimistic about a usable Linux phone in the near future, maybe 5 years from now or so. When smartphones were a new thing, it was really hard for open source projects without a major company backing them to keep up with all the new developments. Hence all the projects that died out. But innovation on smartphones has basically come to a halt these days. Sure, your phone can get a little bit faster and have round displays now, but nobody cares anymore. Nothing of all that is essential. So, give it some time, we’ll get there.

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m optimistic about the apps and desktop environments. We have made huge progress. But the problem is the hardware support. It seems that there are very few ARM SoCs, which work well with the mainline Linux kernel. So PinePhone uses a 2010 SoC and PinePhone Pro a 2016 SoC. And after all that time and despite community’s efforts to upstream everything, the mainline support is still not complete and we still use custom kernels.

      https://blog.mobian.org/posts/2023/09/30/paperweight-dilemma/

      • udon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, but that’s exactly my point. The need for hardware support shrinks if the hardware doesn’t change every few months. A chip from a few years ago is still very fine. That was not the case in 2009.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    If your needs are very simple, and you’re willing to go without a lot of luxuries, then yeah, it could work for you.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I guess specific would be a better word. Like if having a good terminal emulator and SSH client is more important to you than having access to Android apps.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thats pretty much my use case. I run a legacy iphone (i know) and terminal apps arent great so far. I often need to work on the go and carrying a laptop everywhere is tedious. Having a phone with a „simple“ linux OS and terminal emulator would be awesome.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Thats very cool. I‘m still wondering it the pinephone would work for me. I use like 5 apps regularly (obviously would find others I dont recognize as using):

              • Homeassistant (could use web interface)
              • Easypark (probably the most problematic to find)
              • Sonos (might be able to use an open source version such as on debian)
              • Fluffychat
              • Voyager for Lemmy

              The rest is mostly functions I „need“ but dont need specific apps for.

              • Pictures (taking and viewing, maybe nextcloud upload but that could be done by a script as well)
              • Web browser
              • Music
              • Calls

              I think thats about it… Do you think that could work?

              Edit: I have a stupid idea! I fondly remember my blackberry from back in the day. Obviously its not for the mainstream but pinephone isnt either. Wouldnt a step back to a blackberry design be pretty awesome for us nerds? :)

              • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It’s hard to say if it will work for you. For some people it does and for others it doesn’t. It’s just something you would have to see for yourself and it might require some time to set everything up the way you want it. It’s a device that requires tinkering. Voyager seems to have a web version and so does FluffyChat. I use Nheko Matrix client (available in Mobian/Debian repo) - it’s a native app that works pretty well. I don’t know about the other apps, but in general you can run Android apps through Waydroid. Maybe those would work too.

                There are no push notifications, so if you want the phone to suspend and still receive Matrix notifications, you would have to setup a script that will wake the phone up periodically.

                Pictures (taking and viewing, maybe nextcloud upload but that could be done by a script as well)

                This works on the original PinePhone, but the camera itself is pretty bad. PinePhone Pro has a decent one, but I’m not sure what the current state of that is. My understanding is that it works, but the pictures might not look that great. I think it’s only one guy working on the camera app and he is currently working on a new version: https://blog.brixit.nl/fixing-the-megapixels-sensor-linearization/. For syncing files with a desktop I use SyncThing, but Nextcloud should probably work too. For sending just a few specific files from time to time you could use KDE Connect or even just SSH.

                Web browser

                That works. I use Firefox. PinePhone doesn’t have a lot of RAM, though, so you won’t be able to have a lot of tabs open at once.

                Music

                Definitely works. I use Lollypop app (available in Mobian/Debian), which works well on a mobile screen. The phone has a headphone jack if you need it. The speaker isn’t very good.

                Calls

                This works, but audio quality during phone calls isn’t always good. There also seem to be some modem issues on PinePhone Pro: https://zerwuerfnis.org/daily-driving-the-pinephone-pro. I think it’s currently recommended to install the free modem firmware and I’m not sure if the author was using that (the phone doesn’t come with it installed).

                I’m not sure if MMS works (SMS does), since I don’t use that. Support for emergency broadcasts is now being added to Phosh: https://phosh.mobi/posts/cellbroadcast/

                You should also know that the battery life isn’t very good. So if you use the phone a lot, you might need either an extended battery case or spare batteries (the battery is replaceable) or the keyboard addon.

                Edit: I have a stupid idea! I fondly remember my blackberry from back in the day. Obviously its not for the mainstream but pinephone isnt either. Wouldnt a step back to a blackberry design be pretty awesome for us nerds? :)

                I don’t know which one you mean, but I would love to have a slider keyboard! Technically you could make one and I’ve been wondering how hard that would be. PinePhone has some pins on the back that you could use - one of them is i2c. The keyboard addon from Pine64 uses them (they have other addons too). It’s probably a lot of work to make something like that, though.

                • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This is a lot more than I could have hoped for! Thank you so much! :) I‘m somewhat convinced that I need to try this now. :)