If anyone can find more pixels for me i would appreciate it.

Thanks y’all.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    I thought y’all was just a gender neutral term combining you and all.

    How would it be wrong or offensive to refer to refer to trans person as “y’all”? Genuine question.

  • hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Out here in the you guys zone making yall happen. 10 years and you guys will be nearly gone cause people get tired of having to ubsubltly tack on “and gals” or “gals and nonbinary pals”.

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    As a non-english speaker, I appreciate «Y’all» 'cause it always bug me the absence of a way to reference more than one individual in English.

    What you mean «You» is used to reference both one person and a crowd? English is fuck up.

  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m from Maryland and I said “howdy” in New York and I got roasted by the CVS clerk for 2 full minutes. And then I said “do y’all have Tylenol” in hopes that she could point me in the direction. Another minute of her roasting me…

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It feels like a standard case of it’s fine until it isn’t. I wouldn’t worry about it and only drop it from your vocabulary if you notice it causing harm.

  • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I would have thought that “y’all” is even more so gender neutral and therefore less offensive/more accepted. It’s a contraction of “you all” right?

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Honestly it’s just so useful. It should be the default.

          I picked it up when I lived in Houston, but when I was bartending and stuff after returning to my home state, I’d use it heavily.

          Interestingly, though, it made people think I was from another country entirely? Because in absolutely no other way do I sound even remotely southern. (I do use various non-American slang, but not with strangers) Was always a blast to have someone ask where I was from, and try to get them to pinpoint why they didn’t think I was local, when I was born 15 minutes from where the conversation was taking place :p

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    “y’all” fills a legitimately useful gap the English language has. Other languages have a word like this.

    Edit: also something cool I just found out, some languages have a way to disinguish “we” (you and I), and “we” (me and the rest of us, not you). It’s called clusivity and is missing from European languages. Many indigenous languages of the Americas and Oceania have this, as well as Vietnamese and northern dialects of Mandarin.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      The worst is when a language formally has a disambiguating word but then speakers all just decide to not use it.

    • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Any examples of an equivalent in other languages?

      I speak a small amount of French but can’t think of one

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        “Vous” is the first one that comes to mind in french. But since it is also a more formal (and/or “respectful”) version of “tu/toi”, it can both designate a group of people or a single person, depending on the context (just like “you” in English). Sometimes people will use “vous tous” (literally “you all”) to make this clear.

        It is a little better than the “you” situation in English since if you are speaking with someone that is not using the singular form of “vous” to speak about you (which is basically anyone you are familiar with unless they are your boss or In-laws and kind of oldschool), it is instantly clear what they mean at least.

      • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        In Portuguese (especially Brazilian), there are singular and plural forms of “you”: “você” (singular) and “vocês” (plural). In English, “you” behaves like a plural because it’s followed by “are” instead of “is”. The only exception I can see is “yourself” and “yourselves” that refer to both singular and plural forms.

        However, In Portuguese, even though we have “vocês” as plural form, we also use “vocês todos” or “todos vocês” (“you all”/“all of you”) sometimes.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      English used to be like other European languages too. We had thou/thee for singular, and you/ye for plural, and for respectful singular. Eventually, people began using it as respectful singular for everyone, and so it just became singular and plural, eclipsing thou/thee. Around this time, the you/ye accusative/nominative distinction was also lost, so now we just have you.

      If you’re curious, the you/ye distinction worked like this: “you” was used for the subject (the doer) of the sentence, and “ye” was used for the object (the done to). you/ye are analogous to I/me.

      “You come with me.” (plural you)

      “I come with ye.” (plural ye)

      As a result of the loss of thou, we also lost the conjugation of verbs related to it, like “art” instead of “are”, and “-st” or “-est” for other verbs (“goest”, “thinkst”, etc). It used to be that “are” was only for plural pronouns, but now both “you” and “they” can be singular.

      And if you’re curious about what happened to “-eth”, evidence suggests this was for a long time a typographic feature, and it was pronounced “-s” as it is today. It was used exactly like “-s”. “He thinketh” would have been pronounced “he thinks”.

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m from Australia and I’ve started calling all groups of people yall because it’s gender neutral… very unaustralian term, and I love so much the irony of iconic southern terms being used to support trans activism

    • 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m German and I use y’all all the time when speaking English. it’s funny, most of my English is from the internet so it’s the most crazy mix of english

    • gnu@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Why bother with importing y’all when we already have yous (or youse depending on how you want to spell it)? Or you could just treat ‘you guys’ as gender neutral, it effectively is these days with how people use it.

        • gnu@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Fair enough, it does have associations there. Pretty sure I’d toss y’all in the same basket though if I heard anyone trying to make it a thing…

      • jonesy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        As an Australian, why bother importing “y’all” when everyone is already “mate”?

      • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        A lot of trans femmes myself included cannot see ‘guys’ as gender neutral no matter how hard we try and so do not like it.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s rough. That said as a trans woman (no idea what a trans-femme is) I don’t see a problem with it in the context of “you guys”.

          I use “dude” as a general exclamation towards my own also-trans gf sometimes even. Really y’all oughta chill on the language policing. If you pass people will treat you like the gender you look like, if you don’t, they won’t really, no matter how much they try, and your main issue is not passing and thus money which can fix that, not other people and their language use.

          • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            A trans femme is someone who tries to make themselves look more ‘femme’ often through taking estrogen etc, it can refer to trans women as well but also refers to those who don’t completely identify or at all as a woman, see nonbinary folks for example. It’s kind of a catch all term.

            Who said anything bout language policing? I was merely saying for myself. I think passing is a pointless binary concept and not even all cis women ‘pass’. So I’m not all that interested in passing 100%, just being happy to be me.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I have regularly called groups of females “you guys” since childhood. It’s extremely neutral in a lot of the country.

          • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Okay, but not everyone is going to be comfortable with it and so are you saying you would not change your speech for them?

            Also which country?

            • verdigris@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              The US. And yes, I will continue to use the phrase “you guys” because it’s a phrase that means “you people”. I can’t anticipate every illogical thing that will offend people. If someone called me out on it in person I would try not to use the phrase to address them specifically but I would also think they were being very silly.

              • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 days ago

                It always confuses me when people say ‘offend’ people, because usually it is not offense they feel etc.

                Well, that’s not a very fair way of treating/thinking of people, some people are going to be hurt or upset by certain things and it’s better to understand that we all have emotions and they are not pointless just because you see no value in them i.e. ‘illogical’. It’s better to work together and find ways of communicating that aren’t genuinely hurtful ioo.

        • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          People who claim “guys” is gender neutral would most often only count men when asked the question “How many guys did you sleep with in your life?”

          Until I find a single person who immediately thinks of people of any gender at that question, I will not fall for the internalized misogyny of “‘guys’ is gender neutral” meme. (Same with “dudes” and all the other ones I’ve seen over the years. I’ve even seen someone say “bro” is gender neutral.)

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Do we have yous/youse? According to my understanding that’s technically not a real word yet, it’s slang.

        2nd person singular used to be thou/thee back in the middle ages, but it all eventually melded into you.

        I feel like y’all is the newer American version of 2nd person plural, while yous/youse/yinz are the non-American English counterparts.

        I have always used you guys in a gender neutral manner historically, but people occasionally got offended by that. So I started using y’all several years ago and it’s been going pretty good. Although I did initially spell it like ya’ll until someone corrected me on reddit 😅