• SARGEx117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll take F1 over Nascar any day.

      Disclaimer: I’ve never sat down to watch either, but if the choices are “turn left” or “winding, twisting course” I think I’m going with the one that has more variety.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Massive F1 fan here.

        It’s more of an engineering sport than a driving sport. Don’t get me wrong– the drivers are absolutely top notch and do an incredible job and it’s entertaining to watch. But since it’s sooooo engineering and development based, you cars that perform different on different tracks (cuz of elevation, temperature, track design, surface).

        It’s pretty neat; worth a watch sometime!

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is like the argument that football is exciting because it’s a highly strategic sport: the most interesting and exciting things about it are happening on the sidelines in the coaches’ heads while 40% of the time nothing is happening on the field.

          So if the most exciting part of the race is the engineering that went into the car, then what’s the point of watching the race? You’d be probably be more interested watching Bill Nye.

        • SARGEx117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know I don’t have the skills to drive one (at least not yet lol) but those things are engineering marvels.

          I’ve always wanted to see one invert at speed to see if their downforce really is enough.

          I can’t imagine all the materials sciences that go on behind the scenes.

          • frank@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So much cool matsci!

            The exhaust is no longer titanium (it’s inconel) because they 3D print the complicated bits of it now instead of traditional forming techniques

          • frank@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure what you’re referring to but not at all! It’s the inverse of a “spec series” (which still benefit greatly from engineering) where you get handed parts to use. Teams can design the vast majority of parts themselves and do

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure which one, but I think it is F1 where making car too good is banned.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the difference between a marathon and an obstacle course.

        Nascar has some really crazy shit, like building a twisted car to turn left, canting the engines to perform better in turns, making the car as flat as possible on the right to get better aero when up against the wall. They do some wild stuff with the cars, and stretching the rules or “cheating” was, and probably is, a huge part of the sport.

        When it comes to the racing itself, the track layout is usually designed with top sustained speed in mind, which means that a lot of the driver’s finishing position is determined by their ability to battle it out with the other drivers, instead of their ability to optimize the course. Not to mention, that simple “left turn” is deceptively complex. Drivers account for track conditions, like foreign debris, rubber “marbles”, bank angle, and temperature, atmospheric conditions like air density, car conditions like damage, fuel, tire wear and tire temp, and race conditions like remaining laps, position and proximity to other drivers, when they make that “simple left”. Throw in make-or-break pitstops, where the car gets fuel, tires and repairs in less than 10 seconds, and the fact that almost all of this is happening at 170+ MPH, and you realize that oval racing isn’t just a bunch of hilljacks turning left, but a modern gladiator-style chariot race.

  • CosmoNova@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aliens would be really disappointed to find out we already have blue checkmarks invented and people don‘t care nearly enough about it.

  • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of that Black Mirror episode when people could post names of people they wanted to be killed and every day the most posted person were killed. After some time, the man behind that killed all of the people who voted for anybody.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      So in that killer’s mind, wanting someone killed was the morally indefensible crime but actually killing ludicrous numbers of people is not? And he nor anyone else questioned that? 🤔

      • MasterPraetorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bit of context and spoilers - He was making a statement about social media threats/harassment

        The first part - using social media - whoever people vote to be killed, gets killed. Trying to show these actions have consequences. The people voting feel immune to these consequences. They just voted, they didn’t kill anybody.
        He goes through 5 rounds of voting, with more votes every time. After each round, the most voted for is killed.

        Up to this point he’s exposing people trying to use social media to try and harm people Eventually he turns it around, and kills everyone who voted

        The whole thing kicked off because his friend/romantic interest tried to commit suicide from cyber bullying. He’s pushing that these actions have consequences, even if you hide behind a screen.

        The killer himself is a psycho, so the morals aren’t exactly impactful to him. As for anyone else questioning, the definitely do.

        Disclaimer - been a while since I watched the episode. It’s pretty good, definitely need some suspension of disbelief (but that’s most episodes)

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get that what he’s trying to do, it’s just his actions are self-defeating. The only reason the behavior on social media has violent consequences is because he’s imposing them; no one else in that story is killing people based on meaningless Facebook polls. They only matter because he makes them matter. He causes the problems he thinks he is solving.

          Also he assumes his actions will make people reconsider their choices and change, which they won’t because people for the most part aren’t capable of change. Most people don’t have the ability to do so. Those who do deliberately refuse to because they’re happy the way they are regardless of their true nature’s consequences to other people.

          It’s just a stupid gimmicky show pretending to be deep to get views. That’s all.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is how every episode of Black Mirror is. Just little interesting “what if” scenarios that make you think. In the same way that fairy tales are contrived and unrealistic these are too.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The fact that there’s some discussion going on about it is evidence of that. It’s similar to the “would you press a button for a million dollars but a random person on earth dies” type of question. “Does voting to kill someone mean your responsible for the murder if they’re going to kill someone anyways?”

                • Nobsi@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m sorry i was just being mean to be mean. I think blackmirror is as thought provoking or interesting as the big bang theory

          • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Behavior on social media can definitely have consequences in real life, even violent. Many shooters vere radicalized by social media groups, for example.

    • Hank@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah you mean racing. For a moment I wanted to argue that it’s more humane to eradicate pugs due to their miserable health problems.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They will release one episode a month to milk your $99 per month introductory rate. The runtime will be 21 minutes with 39 minutes of ads interspersed.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    pedantic_mode 1

    As there’s only one race, I guess everyone who chose anything but none gets the human race symbol (???) tattoed on their face. Still would be fun to see who chose to have other humans killed.

    Now, if the OP in 4chan meant ethnicity, that’s a different story.

    pedantic_mode 0

    • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      pedantic_mode 1

      The definition of “race” varies widely between different demographics and contexts. In a biological context which you seem to be insinuating, “race” is either nonsensical or an ancient synonym for species.

      pedantic mode 0

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I legit question why people should be morally condemned for choosing to have others killed. It’s too important a survival mechanism to just dismiss with morality like that, and claiming it’s wrong violates the himan right to freedom of thought. Humans are allowed to hate each other. They’re allowed to want negative things, even to have others killed.

      The premise itself is self-defeating because it uses the act of labeling people who make a choice to be targeted for violence and death to defeat the concept of doing so. Its use legitimizes the practice even to criticize it. Humans have to select other people to be targeted for violence because it’s ultimately the only effective way to regulate behavior and enforce social norms, and refusing to do so destroys societies.

      People need to stop judging others on their thoughts and feelings and start focusing on their actions.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aliens observing will think this already happened here. The chaos is real presently. I’m checking this off list of things to worry about.

  • melooone@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Products and services that hide/remove that tattoo would skyrocket. Tattoo removal places would probably become super rich.

    • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m willing to bet that the ayylmaos would be smart enough to think of that and make it somehow permanent like nanomachine pigments imbedded in your brain that re-emerges on the skin eventually or smthn

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can I write in “mosquitos” for extermination, or is it a multiple choice ballot?